Re: Announce: modutils 2.3.24 is available

2001-01-03 Thread Matthias Andree
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > >I can send in a patch if you want (that just changes the docs, but not > >the functionality). > > Don't bother. It will change in 2.5 anyway, I can live with the odd > query until then. If you really want to get only the version number > then this wil

Re: Announce: modutils 2.3.24 is available

2001-01-03 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:40:05 +0100, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > >> Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >There's a problem. depmod should not try to do anything besides giving >> >its version when --version is used, should it? >>

Re: Announce: modutils 2.3.24 is available

2001-01-03 Thread Matthias Andree
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >There's a problem. depmod should not try to do anything besides giving > >its version when --version is used, should it? > > Historical accident. I want to clean that up but it breaks existing > behaviour; s

Re: Announce: modutils 2.3.24 is available

2001-01-02 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001 19:12:49 +0100, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There's a problem. depmod should not try to do anything besides giving >its version when --version is used, should it? Historical accident. I want to clean that up but it breaks existing behaviour; somewhere, somebod

Re: Announce: modutils 2.3.24 is available

2001-01-02 Thread Matthias Andree
On Mon, 01 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > ftp://ftp..kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.3 > > modutils-2.3.24-1.src.rpm As above, in SRPM format There's a problem. depmod should not try to do anything besides giving its version when --version is used, should it? I'd rather expe