On 20180628 04:38, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Martin Steigerwald - 28.06.18, 13:30:
jdow - 28.06.18, 12:00:
On 20180628 01:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
[…]
That brings to the fore an interesting question. Why bother with
RDBs
over 2TB unless you want a disk with one single partition? This
Wi
Martin Steigerwald - 28.06.18, 13:30:
> jdow - 28.06.18, 12:00:
> > On 20180628 01:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> […]
>
> > >> That brings to the fore an interesting question. Why bother with
> > >> RDBs
> > >> over 2TB unless you want a disk with one single partition? This
> > >> Win10
> > >> mo
jdow - 28.06.18, 12:00:
> On 20180628 01:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
[…]
> >> That brings to the fore an interesting question. Why bother with
> >> RDBs
> >> over 2TB unless you want a disk with one single partition? This
> >> Win10
> >> monster I am using has a modest BIOS driver partition for t
On 20180628 01:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Dear Joanne.
jdow - 28.06.18, 08:39:
Anything done to RDBs for Linux must remain 100.000% compatible with
existing Amiga equipment. Otherwise, what's the point of bothering to
use RDBs?
Done to, in the sense of written to: Yes. I completely agre
Changing subject, so that there is at least a chance for someone to find
this discussions with a search engine :)
Joanne,
jdow - 28.06.18, 04:57:
> The issue is what happens when one of those disks appears on a 3.1
> system. {^_^}
That is right, so I think the warning about 64 bit support in na
5 matches
Mail list logo