Re: Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

2018-06-28 Thread jdow
On 20180628 04:38, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Martin Steigerwald - 28.06.18, 13:30: jdow - 28.06.18, 12:00: On 20180628 01:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote: […] That brings to the fore an interesting question. Why bother with RDBs over 2TB unless you want a disk with one single partition? This Wi

Re: Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

2018-06-28 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Martin Steigerwald - 28.06.18, 13:30: > jdow - 28.06.18, 12:00: > > On 20180628 01:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > […] > > > >> That brings to the fore an interesting question. Why bother with > > >> RDBs > > >> over 2TB unless you want a disk with one single partition? This > > >> Win10 > > >> mo

Re: Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

2018-06-28 Thread Martin Steigerwald
jdow - 28.06.18, 12:00: > On 20180628 01:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote: […] > >> That brings to the fore an interesting question. Why bother with > >> RDBs > >> over 2TB unless you want a disk with one single partition? This > >> Win10 > >> monster I am using has a modest BIOS driver partition for t

Re: Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB

2018-06-28 Thread jdow
On 20180628 01:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Dear Joanne. jdow - 28.06.18, 08:39: Anything done to RDBs for Linux must remain 100.000% compatible with existing Amiga equipment. Otherwise, what's the point of bothering to use RDBs? Done to, in the sense of written to: Yes. I completely agre

Re: Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB (was: Re: moving affs + RDB partition support to staging?)

2018-06-28 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Changing subject, so that there is at least a chance for someone to find this discussions with a search engine :) Joanne, jdow - 28.06.18, 04:57: > The issue is what happens when one of those disks appears on a 3.1 > system. {^_^} That is right, so I think the warning about 64 bit support in na