Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

2005-08-25 Thread Michael Kerrisk
David, > On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 14:49 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > If I change your program to do something like the above, I also > > do not see a message from the handler -- i.e., it is not being > > called, and I'm pretty sure it should be. > > Hm, yes. What happens is we come back out of

Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

2005-08-24 Thread Ulrich Drepper
David Woodhouse wrote: > If it's mandatory that we actually call the signal handler, then we need > to play tricks like sigsuspend() does to leave the old signal mask on > the stack frame. That's a bit painful atm because do_signal is different > between architectures. It is necessary that the ha

Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

2005-08-05 Thread Michael Kerrisk
> From: David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls. > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:36:54 +0100 > > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:38 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > > Eep -- I hadn't noticed that difference. Will update patch &g