rom: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:59 PM
> To: Salyzyn, Mark
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AACRAID failure with 2.6.13-rc1
>
> "Salyzyn, Mark" <[EMAIL PROT
failure with 2.6.13-rc1
"Salyzyn, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin may be overplaying the performance angle.
>
> A previous patch took the adapter from 64K to 4MB transaction sizes
> across the board. This caused Martin's adapter and drive combination
to
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Salyzyn, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Martin may be overplaying the performance angle.
> >
> > A previous patch took the adapter from 64K to 4MB transaction sizes
> > across the board. This caused Martin's adapter and drive combination to
"Salyzyn, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin may be overplaying the performance angle.
>
> A previous patch took the adapter from 64K to 4MB transaction sizes
> across the board. This caused Martin's adapter and drive combination to
> tip-over. We had to scale back to 128KB sized transact
n, Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AACRAID failure with 2.6.13-rc1
. . .
ah, thanks.
A temporary workaround which might affct performance sounds better than
a
dead box though.
Mark, do you think that many systems are likely to be affected this way?
Do you think we should do something tempo
Martin Drab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > [ 278.732829] scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to offline device
> > > [ 278.735954] Buffer I/O error on device sda2, logical block 491840
> > > [ 278.739147] lost page write due to I/O error on sda2
> > > [ 278.742389] scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Martin Drab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a problem with the AACRAID driver on 2.6.13-rc1-git6 (also tested
> > with -git4). I have an Adaptec AAR-2410SA SATA RAID controller card with 2
> > RAIDs defined on (sda (Data 2) is a
7 matches
Mail list logo
