Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
> Jonathan Morton wrote:
> >
> > The kernel itself takes up some RAM, which is simply subtracted from the
> > "total memory available" field in the memory summaries available to
> > user-mode processes. This is perfectly normal.
>
> The kernel reserves 4m for hilself. Th
Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> >> If crashes are routine on this machine, I'd recommend that you take
> >> a serious look at your ram. (or if you're overclocking, don't)
> >
> >Crashes were routine, and I was not overclocking, so I took Mike's
> >advice and bought a new 256MB DIMM. The computer hasn'
>> If crashes are routine on this machine, I'd recommend that you take
>> a serious look at your ram. (or if you're overclocking, don't)
>
>Crashes were routine, and I was not overclocking, so I took Mike's
>advice and bought a new 256MB DIMM. The computer hasn't crashed
>once since I installed it
Alex Baretta wrote:
> [alex@localhost /home]$ free -m
> total used free sharedbuffers
> cached
> Mem: 251209 42 60
> 61 92
>
> I strongly doubt this can be a bug in the kernel. Could anyone
> explain to me why this might h
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Alex Baretta wrote:
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > If crashes are routine on this machine, I'd recommend that you take
> > a serious look at your ram. (or if you're overclocking, don't)
>
> Crashes were routine, and I was not overclocking, so I took Mik
5 matches
Mail list logo
