Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-10-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >> I think the conclusion looking at the bug report > >> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54575) is > >> that the commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 should be > >>

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-10-05 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
> So 3.5 and later really don't seem to have any issue with this patch. > I'm as puzzled as ever. Thanks for testing this again. > Bad news from 3.6: I got a blank screen there too, yesterday. Maybe it had even happened in 3.5 once before I got into testing all those 3.4/3.0 images - at my week

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-10-04 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:17:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Andreas Sturmlechner > wrote: > >> Andreas, can you please check whether 3.5.x works for you, just to > >> make sure that this particular elephant is only wreaking havoc in 3.4 > >> and earlier? > > >

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >> Andreas, can you please check whether 3.5.x works for you, just to >> make sure that this particular elephant is only wreaking havoc in 3.4 >> and earlier? > > I've been using 3.5 all the time since .0, I never had any trouble there -

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-10-01 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
> Andreas, can you please check whether 3.5.x works for you, just to > make sure that this particular elephant is only wreaking havoc in 3.4 > and earlier? I've been using 3.5 all the time since .0, I never had any trouble there - a few reboots just now with a vanilla 3.5.4 image were successful

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:15:38PM +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >> > Ok, now reverted, thanks. >> > >> > greg k-h >> >> The same patch also breaks 3.0 for me. A 3.0.42 image with the patch >> reverted was fine, I checked with several restarts

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-30 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:15:38PM +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > Ok, now reverted, thanks. > > > > greg k-h > > The same patch also breaks 3.0 for me. A 3.0.42 image with the patch > reverted was fine, I checked with several restarts. > > Sort of confirms there is something in >=3.5 tha

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-30 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
> Ok, now reverted, thanks. > > greg k-h The same patch also breaks 3.0 for me. A 3.0.42 image with the patch reverted was fine, I checked with several restarts. Sort of confirms there is something in >=3.5 that makes this thing work. Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-28 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:16:01AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >> I think the conclusion looking at the bug report > >> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54575) is > >> that the commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 should

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> I think the conclusion looking at the bug report >> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54575) is >> that the commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 should be >> reverted on 3.4, please correct me if I'm wrong. > > Daniel, do y

Re: Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-27 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
> > I haven't tried 3.4.11 yet OK, first two tries just now, instant black screens: - 3.4.11 - 3.0.42 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htm

Re: Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-27 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
> > Did anything ever come from this? I haven't reverted anything, or > applied anything different, so if something needs to be done here, > please let me know. > I haven't tried 3.4.11 yet, I was only coming back from 3.5 in the hunt for a different bug, so - with a lot of bad coincidence - i

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-27 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:59:18PM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:42:23PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:07:38AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:58:03AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > > >

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-27 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:42:23PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:07:38AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:58:03AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > > > Couldn't it be that it happens because 3.4 doesn't have commits > > > b7884eb45e

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-26 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:07:38AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:58:03AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > > Couldn't it be that it happens because 3.4 doesn't have commits > > b7884eb45ec98c0d34c7f49005ae9d4b4b4e38f6 and > > f01db988ef6f6c70a6cc36ee71

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-10 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:58:03AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > Couldn't it be that it happens because 3.4 doesn't have commits > b7884eb45ec98c0d34c7f49005ae9d4b4b4e38f6 and > f01db988ef6f6c70a6cc36ee71e4a98a68901229 applied? May be they are needed > after all. Nevermind, the descrip

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-10 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:37:27AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Andreas Sturmlechner > wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:27:12AM +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > please revert commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 - for

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:27:12AM +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > please revert commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 - for some >> > reason it breaks boot-up (screen stays blank) on my GM45 hardware

Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-06 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:27:12AM +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > Hello, > > > > please revert commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 - for some > > reason it breaks boot-up (screen stays blank) on my GM45 hardware despite > > >= 3.5 being fine. > > > > See bug 54575 on freed

Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

2012-09-06 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:27:12AM +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > Hello, > > please revert commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 - for some > reason it breaks boot-up (screen stays blank) on my GM45 hardware despite >= > 3.5 being fine. > > See bug 54575 on freedesktop.org for a