Re: 2.6.24-rt1 IRQ routing anomaly

2008-02-21 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Mark Hounschell wrote: > > > > To prove this is the problem, boot with noapic in the kernel command line. > > 1) the problem should disappear. > > 2) (I'm betting) you see that the eth and EMU10K1 share the same > >interrupt line. > > > > Yep, you were right. They do share

Re: 2.6.24-rt1 IRQ routing anomaly

2008-02-21 Thread Mark Hounschell
Steven Rostedt wrote: > [CC'd Thomas and Jon] > > Thomas, Jon, looks like the someone has the funny interrupt controller. > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Mark Hounschell wrote: > >> According to /proc/interrupts, every interrupt received by eth1 is also >> being received by the sound card EMU10K1. The

Re: 2.6.24-rt1 IRQ routing anomaly

2008-02-21 Thread Steven Rostedt
[CC'd Thomas and Jon] Thomas, Jon, looks like the someone has the funny interrupt controller. On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Mark Hounschell wrote: > According to /proc/interrupts, every interrupt received by eth1 is also > being received by the sound card EMU10K1. The problem showed itself > first with t

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-28 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > > > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > > > History: > > > > > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-28 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > > History: > > > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications. > > 2.6.24-rt1: same so far. > > > > Why: Jack keep

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-26 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > History: > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications. > 2.6.24-rt1: same so far. > > Why: Jack keeps printing "delayed..." messages and has xruns which means > that somehow

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-26 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun" messa

Re: 2.6.24-rt1

2008-01-25 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > *** NOTICE *** > > This still has the old version of the latency tracer. I'll try to > release a -rt2 soon that has the new version. This way we can see what > kind of regressions the new version might give. > This is taking longer than expected. Rem