Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07.02.2008 23:17:12:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
> What is it? It has to live on some kind of bus, right?
It is a piece of hardware with a firmware/hypervisor abstraction layer on
top.
The hypervisor provides virtualiz
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29.01.2008 14:23:09:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> ...
> > > The sym-link is not gereated automatically as the device for portX is
> added
> > > to
How about this patch?
David
---
IGET: Fix isofs_get_block() to only return 0 on success.
From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix isofs_get_block() to return only 0 on success. It shouldn't return a +ve
block count for example.
Also make sure that isofs_get_blocks() doesn't accidentally re
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 15:20, Christoph Raisch wrote:
> These pci functions corresponds to a
> /sys/bus/ibmebus/devices/789D.001.XX-P1/port0
> and
> /sys/bus/ibmebus/devices/789D.001.XX-P1/port1
>
> The busdriver currently does not find out, how many ports are in a
> /sys/bus/ibmebus/
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29.01.2008 14:23:09:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
...
> > The sym-link is not gereated automatically as the device for portX is
added
> > to the eHEA device (as subnode) where the eHEA device is not a bus.
>
> Then please
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008 20:22, you wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is now broken in mainline...
> > > >
> > >
On Monday 28 January 2008 20:22, you wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > >
> > > This is now broken in mainline...
> > >
> > > drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function 'ehea_driver_sysfs_add':
> > > drivers/
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:22:04PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has
Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
> > > > > driver_private which
> > > > > contains the me
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:16:48AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
>
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
> > > driver_private w
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
> >
> > On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a mem
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
> >
> > On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a mem
Sorry for the *really* late answer, but I did not have any time to do
linux things the last weeks. :-(
On Jan 7, 2008 7:16 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:03:42 +0100
> "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2008 2:33 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
>
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
> > > driver_private which
> > > contains the member kobj (accor
Hi,
sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct driver_private
> > which
> > contains the member kobj (according to drivers/base/base.h).
> > But in
On Monday 14 January 2008 6:04:28 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:46 EST, Paul Moore said:
> > http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing;a=commitdiff
> >;h=02f1c89d6e36507476f78108a3dcc78538be460b
>
> Initial testing indicates that 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 plus this
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:46 EST, Paul Moore said:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing;a=commitdiff;h=02f1c89d6e36507476f78108a3dcc78538be460b
Initial testing indicates that 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 plus this one commit is
behaving itself correctly - my Tcl test case that reliab
On Monday 14 January 2008 2:37:02 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:46 EST, Paul Moore said:
> > There have been quite a few changes in lblnet-2.6_testing since
> > 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 so I would recommend taking the whole tree. I'm also not
> > quite sure if
>
> Weird. I did a '
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:46 EST, Paul Moore said:
> There have been quite a few changes in lblnet-2.6_testing since
> 2.6.24-rc6-mm1
> so I would recommend taking the whole tree. I'm also not quite sure if
Weird. I did a 'git clone
git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing'
in
On Monday 14 January 2008 1:50:39 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:10 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in
> > 24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd3865b884952bd93c339d48725c33 adding some
> > warning printk's. Would it be
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:10 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in
> 24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd3865b884952bd93c339d48725c33 adding some warning
> printk's. Would it be more productive to test against the full tree, or
> leaving out the on
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:05:48 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm pulling git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing at the
> moment, and seeing if there's already a fix in there for this.
Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in
24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd38
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:36:40 EST, Paul Moore said:
> Are you still only seeing these problems on loopback? I can't help but
> wonder
> if this is the skb_clone() problem where it wasn't copying skb->iif causing
> SELinux to silently drop the packets.
Yes, I've only spotted it on loopback. Th
On Monday 14 January 2008 11:15:38 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:35:33 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I'm seeing problems with Sendmail on 24-rc6-mm1, where the main Sendmail
> > is listening on ::1/25, and Fetchmail connects to 127.0.0.1:25 to inject
> > mail it has just f
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:35:33 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm seeing problems with Sendmail on 24-rc6-mm1, where the main Sendmail is
> listening on ::1/25, and Fetchmail connects to 127.0.0.1:25 to inject mail it
> has just fetched from an outside server via IMAP - it will often just hang and
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Any ideas?
Please provide a packet dump on both sides (or at least the sender
side).
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.or
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:11:15PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:30:56 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc6/2.6.24-rc6-mm1/
>
>
> With CONFIG_BLOCK=n:
>
> LD drivers/block/built-in.o
> /local/
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:03:05PM +0530, Sudhir Kumar wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Kernel build fails on my machine with error :
>
>
> LD drivers/net/ehea/built-in.o
> CC [M] drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.o
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function ???ehea_driver_sysfs_add???:
> drivers/net/eh
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:04:42 +0100
Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:57:53AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..495575a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/iommu-h
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:57:53AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
...
> diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..495575a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> +/*
> + * IOMMU helper functions for the free area management
>
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:54:45 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- a/lib/iommu-helper.c~a
> > > +++ a/lib/iommu-helper.c
> > > @@ -8,15 +8,20 @@
> > > static unsigned long find_next_zero_area(unsigned long *map,
> > >unsigned long size,
> >
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:27:39 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:57:53 +0900
> FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew, can you replace
> >
> > iommu-sg-add-iommu-helper-functions-for-the-free-area-management.patch
> >
> > with the updated patc
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:57:53 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew, can you replace
>
> iommu-sg-add-iommu-helper-functions-for-the-free-area-management.patch
>
> with the updated patch:
>
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048997.html
>
> For your con
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:59:48 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The patches are available at:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/iommu/
> >
> > Or if you prefer the git tree:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/p
* FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patches are available at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/iommu/
>
> Or if you prefer the git tree:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-misc.git
> iommu-sg-fixes
btw., these improvements to
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:50:49 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:56:09 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > i'm also wondering - what would be the easiest way to integrate kexec
> > > into an automated test environment. If i have a bzIma
Hi,
Am Montag 07 Januar 2008 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is evil select playing games (again).
> > We have LEDS_CLASS equal y but NEW_LEDS equal n
>
> Ah, OK, thanks.
>
> I'll switch oz99x-i2c-button-and-led-support-driver.patch over to using
> non-evi
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:15:31 +0100
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:49:55AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:53:58 +0530 "sudhir kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew!
> > >
> > > Kernel build fails on my ppc64 machine. It s
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:49:55AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:53:58 +0530 "sudhir kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew!
> >
> > Kernel build fails on my ppc64 machine. It seems to be a dependency
> > problem with CONFIG_USB_GADGET not set.
> > Config file is
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:53:58 +0530 "sudhir kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew!
>
> Kernel build fails on my ppc64 machine. It seems to be a dependency
> problem with CONFIG_USB_GADGET not set.
> Config file is attached.
>
> CC init/version.o
> LD init/built-in.o
> LD
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:56:09 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > i'm also wondering - what would be the easiest way to integrate kexec
> > into an automated test environment. If i have a bzImage kernel, is kexec
> > still supposed to work? Could i for example do
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 08:22:37AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:56:09 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Andrew, Ingo, Thomas, Peter,
> > > >
> > > > x86: rever
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:56:09 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew, Ingo, Thomas, Peter,
> > >
> > > x86: revert i386: handle an initrd in highmem
> > >
> > > The patch caused a failure while
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:56:09PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew, Ingo, Thomas, Peter,
> > >
> > > x86: revert i386: handle an initrd in highmem
> > >
> > > The patch caused a failure
* Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew, Ingo, Thomas, Peter,
> >
> > x86: revert i386: handle an initrd in highmem
> >
> > The patch caused a failure while booting a kexec kernel.
> > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/7/42 has the bise
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Hi Andrew, Ingo, Thomas, Peter,
>
> x86: revert i386: handle an initrd in highmem
>
> The patch caused a failure while booting a kexec kernel.
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/7/42 has the bisect details.)
>
> The following patch reverts it.
>
> Signed-o
Hi Andrew, Ingo, Thomas, Peter,
x86: revert i386: handle an initrd in highmem
The patch caused a failure while booting a kexec kernel.
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/7/42 has the bisect details.)
The following patch reverts it.
Signed-off-by: Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[EMA
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:03:42 +0100
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 2:33 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:35 +0100
> > "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:15:54 -0800
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:03:02 +0100 Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is from allnoconfig on sparc64:
> >
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `kvmap_vmemmap'
On Jan 6, 2008 2:33 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:35 +0100
> "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100
> > > "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:30:48AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
...
> I think this bug is highly timing dependent. Its not always the same
> package that dies and as this is a SMP system I would guess two CPUs
> using the same data will trigger this.
> And using the poison-option will definitily sl
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:35 +0100
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100
> > "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I will applie your patch and see if this hunk from
> > > f
On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100
> "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will applie your patch and see if this hunk from
> > find_next_zero_area() makes a difference:
> >
> >end = index + nr;
> > - if
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 4:28 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:24 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PRO
On Jan 6, 2008 4:28 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:24 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > But the cause of my mail is the following question:
> > > Re
On Jan 6, 2008 9:27 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:52:32PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> ...
> > So my personal conclusion would be, that someone is writing to memory
> > that he no longer owns. Most probably 0-bytes. (the complete_routine
> > got NULLe
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:03:02 +0100 Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is from allnoconfig on sparc64:
>
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `kvmap_vmemmap':
> (.text+0x34ec): undefined reference to `vmemmap_table'
> arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o:
Hello,
This is from allnoconfig on sparc64:
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `kvmap_vmemmap':
(.text+0x34ec): undefined reference to `vmemmap_table'
arch/sparc64/kernel/head.o: In function `kvmap_vmemmap':
(.text+0x34f4): undefined reference to `vmemmap_tabl
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:52:32PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
...
> So my personal conclusion would be, that someone is writing to memory
> that he no longer owns. Most probably 0-bytes. (the complete_routine
> got NULLed and the warning about dst->__refcnt being 0).
>
> Use-after-free or someth
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:24 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 2008 3:52 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 5, 2008 11:13 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Jan 5, 2008 11:10 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to git.battery (includes git-net and
> git-netdev-all) worked for 110 packages, then I proclaimed it good.
> 2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to (including) git.nfsd is currently
> getting testet (9 packages d
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 3:52 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2008 11:13 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:01:02AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > > On
On Jan 5, 2008 3:52 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 11:13 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:01:02AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > On Jan 5, 2008 1:07 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I think it wou
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:29:04PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hi Randy.
Sorry for long delay.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:19:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
CC drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.o
In file included from
/local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24-rc
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:29:04PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi Randy.
>
> Sorry for long delay.
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:19:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > CC drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.o
> > In file included from
> > /local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24-rc6
Hi Randy.
Sorry for long delay.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:19:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> CC drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.o
> In file included from
> /local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.c:19:
> include2/asm/gpio.h:4:18: error: gpio.h: No
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:01:02AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 1:07 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:21:26PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The only thing that
On Jan 5, 2008 1:07 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:21:26PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only thing that is sadly not practical is bisecting the borkenout
> > mm-patches, as tr
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:21:26PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I'm open for any suggestions and will try to answer any questions.
I'm very glad, thanks!
> The only thing that is sadly not practical is bisecting the borken
On Jan 4, 2008 4:21 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - above git-nfsd and git-net tests should be probably repeated with
> > -rc6-mm1 git versions: so vanilla rc6 plus both these -mm patches
> > only, and if bug t
On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04-01-2008 11:23, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > On Jan 2, 2008 10:51 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >>> Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not se
On 04-01-2008 11:23, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 10:51 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>>> Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
>> OK that's great. The next step would be to try
On Jan 2, 2008 10:51 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
>
> OK that's great. The next step would be to try excluding specific git
> trees from mm t
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:37:46PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 10:57 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > The two specific trees of interest would be git-nfsd and git-net.
> >
> > Also, if it's git-nfs
On Jan 2, 2008 10:57 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > The two specific trees of interest would be git-nfsd and git-net.
>
> Also, if it's git-nfsd, it'd be useful to test with the current git-nfsd
> from the for-mm bran
On Jan 2, 2008 10:57 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > >
> > > Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
> >
> > OK that's g
> could we perhaps just replace it with a tty_mutex? (possibly a recursive
> one) I suspect by now most of the BKL dependencies there have become
> local to the tty code? Or are there deep VFS dependencies as well? (if
> yes, what type of dependencies?)
The big problem is that nobody actually k
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
>
> OK that's great. The next step would be to try excluding specific git
> trees from mm to
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>
> Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
OK that's great. The next step would be to try excluding specific git
trees from mm to see if they make a difference.
The two specific trees of interest would
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Try to delete your fs/ directory in your output dir. Then I expect
> > > > the same bug to surface again.
> > >
> > > It does
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Try to delete your fs/ directory in your output dir. Then I expect
> > > the same bug to surface again.
> >
> > It does surface indeed.
>
> could you try the patch from Sam below - do
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try to delete your fs/ directory in your output dir. Then I expect
> > the same bug to surface again.
>
> It does surface indeed.
could you try the patch from Sam below - does it fix the problem?
Thanks,
Ingo
-->
Subject: x8
On Jan 1, 2008 1:04 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case, I suspect the cause of your problem is that somebody
> somewhere is doing a double-free on an skb.
>
> Since you're the only person who can reproduce this, we really need
> your help to track this down. Since bisecting th
* Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BKL properties, that could be wrapped. I guess fixing the TTY code
> > to have no BKL dependencies has a higher chance of success - given
> > that Alan is working on it :-)
>
> Bit by bit when I can face it, and with a lot of other people
> contributi
> BKL properties, that could be wrapped. I guess fixing the TTY code to
> have no BKL dependencies has a higher chance of success - given that
> Alan is working on it :-)
Bit by bit when I can face it, and with a lot of other people
contributing parts. Right now the BKL mostly protects the open/
* Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would be sweet to have them use private mutexes for the job
> > instead (although even then it probably wouldn't be a straight
> > conversion)...
>
> I tried a quick conversion of reiser3 at the time, but it really wants
> a recursive lock a
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:12 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2008 22:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I've seen 1s+ desktop latencies due to PREEMPT_BKL when I was still
> > using reiserfs.
>
> Fair enough; so the former ifdefery would be preferable for now then.
To be honest, I
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 22:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 21:31 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Monday 31 December 2007 00:10, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Ingo, it's not good that we have cond_resched() definitions
> > > > > co
* Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (or -- why do we even make CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL an option? [...]
thanks for the reminder - i just zapped it. Was a pleasure ;-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 21:31 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Monday 31 December 2007 00:10, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ingo, it's not good that we have cond_resched() definitions
> > > > conditionally duplicated in kernel.h - that's increasing the risk of
On Monday 31 December 2007 00:10, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ingo, it's not good that we have cond_resched() definitions
> > > conditionally duplicated in kernel.h - that's increasing the risk of
> > > bugs like this one.
> >
> > Actually, why do we even have
On Jan 1, 2008 1:59 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 1:04 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:15:19PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > >
> > > I then tried to "fix" it with this suspect.
> > > I changed "skb_release_all(dst);" back
On Jan 1, 2008 1:04 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:15:19PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > I then tried to "fix" it with this suspect.
> > I changed "skb_release_all(dst);" back to "skb_release_data(dst);" in
> > skb_morph() (net/core/skbuff.c).
>
> Chec
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:15:19PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>
> I then tried to "fix" it with this suspect.
> I changed "skb_release_all(dst);" back to "skb_release_data(dst);" in
> skb_morph() (net/core/skbuff.c).
Check /proc/net/snmp to see if you're getting any fragments, if not
then skb_m
On Monday 31 December 2007 4:46:09 pm James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Paul Moore wrote:
> > I'm pretty certain this is an uninitialized value problem now and not a
> > use-after-free issue. The invalid/garbage ->iif value seems to only
> > happen on packets that are generated locally an
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm pretty certain this is an uninitialized value problem now and not a
> use-after-free issue. The invalid/garbage ->iif value seems to only happen
> on packets that are generated locally and sent back into the stack for local
> consumption, e.g. loopb
On Dec 30, 2007 4:34 AM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 2:30 AM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:51:13PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > >
> > > > > The cause, why I am resending this: I just got a crash with
> > > > > 2.6.24-rc6-mm
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:30:56 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc6/2.6.24-rc6-mm1/
With CONFIG_BLOCK=n:
LD drivers/block/built-in.o
/local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/drivers/base/core.c: In function
'device_add_class_sy
On Monday 31 December 2007 12:13:32 pm Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 December 2007 4:52:03 pm James Morris wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2007, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > As James said I'm away right now and computer access is limited.
> > > However, I'm stuck in the airport right now and spent some
On Monday 31 December 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> CC drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.o
> In file included from
> /local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c:27:
> include2/asm/gpio.h:4:18: error: gpio.h: No such file or directory
Find whatever broken patch select
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
