Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - SCSI/blkdev probing hang

2007-12-24 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:22:12 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:57:45 -0500 > Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 seems to have a hang related to the SCSI or block > > device probing code. > It could be a scsi problem, or it could be a

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:51:45 +0100 Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's a test patch: > > Tested on 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc5-mm1. The patch fixes the bug. > > Thanks a lot to both of you. Thank you for testing -mm (especially on sparc64) and for reporting the bug and for testing

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-21 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > > [ 145.128915] TSTATE: 004411009603 TPC: 005119ac TNPC: > > > 005119b0 Y: Not tainted > > > [ 145.128940] TPC: > > > > My suspicion at this point is that with certain RAM layouts, simply > > iterating over PFN's is simply not working out. > > That

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-21 Thread Jason Wessel
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:55:51 -0600 > Jason Wessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc5/2.6.24-rc5-mm1/ >>> >>> - git-kgdb.patch is still dropped for the same reason >>> >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-20 Thread David Miller
From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:06:55 -0600 > @@ -707,7 +707,10 @@ static ssize_t kpagecount_read(struct fi > return -EIO; > > while (count > 0) { > - ppage = pfn_to_page(pfn++); > + ppage = 0; > + if (pfn_v

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-20 Thread Matt Mackall
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:17:26PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:47:55 +0100 > > > [ 145.128915] TSTATE: 004411009603 TPC: 005119ac TNPC: > > 005119b0 Y: Not tainted > > [ 145.128940] TPC: >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-20 Thread David Miller
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:47:55 +0100 > [ 145.128915] TSTATE: 004411009603 TPC: 005119ac TNPC: > 005119b0 Y: Not tainted > [ 145.128940] TPC: My suspicion at this point is that with certain RAM layouts, simply iterati

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:55:51 -0600 Jason Wessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc5/2.6.24-rc5-mm1/ > > > > - If something goes wrong with a PCI device's probing or initialisation, try > > reverting pci-di

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - SCSI/blkdev probing hang

2007-12-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:57:45 -0500 Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 seems to have a hang related to the SCSI or block > device probing code. > > This is on a dual quad-core x86-64 system with megaraid_sas controller. > > scsi 0:2:0:0: Direct-Access DELL PERC 5/i

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - SCSI/blkdev probing hang

2007-12-20 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:40:50 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 seems to have a hang related to the SCSI or block device probing code. This is on a dual quad-core x86-64 system with megaraid_sas controller. scsi 0:2:0:0: Direct-Access DELL PERC 5/i

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-20 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > > Actually, you may only need these two: > > > > > > > maps4-add-proc-kpagecount-interface.patch > > > > maps4-add-proc-kpageflags-interface.patch > > > > Yes these two were enough, and exporting fs/proc/base.c's > > mem_lseek(). > > > > As hard as I try, I can't reproduce this at a

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-20 Thread Matt Mackall
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:53:59AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:55:54 -0600 > > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:39:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Actually, you may only need these two: > > > > > maps4-add-proc-kpagecount-interf

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-20 Thread Jason Wessel
Andrew Morton wrote: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc5/2.6.24-rc5-mm1/ > > - If something goes wrong with a PCI device's probing or initialisation, try > reverting pci-disable-decoding-during-sizing-of-bars.patch. > > - git-sched was dropped due to breakin

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote: > On Dec 19, 2007 8:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote: > > > On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thursday, 20 of Decemb

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-20 Thread David Miller
From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:55:54 -0600 > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:39:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Actually, you may only need these two: > > > maps4-add-proc-kpagecount-interface.patch > > maps4-add-proc-kpageflags-interface.patch Yes these two were

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-19 Thread Dave Young
On Dec 20, 2007 11:34 AM, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note carefully. This: > > > > > 2. on 2.6.24-rc5 kernel reports only the part 1, after try mount the > > > > disk it reports the part 2 and mount the partition as rw > > contradicts this: > > > > > 3. on 2.6.24-rc5 kernel reports on

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Miles Lane
On Dec 19, 2007 8:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote: > > On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, R

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-19 Thread Alan Stern
Note carefully. This: > > > 2. on 2.6.24-rc5 kernel reports only the part 1, after try mount the > > > disk it reports the part 2 and mount the partition as rw contradicts this: > > > 3. on 2.6.24-rc5 kernel reports only the part 1, after try mount the > > > disk it just mount the partition as

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Miles Lane wrote: > On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > We could reexport drain_local_pages() aga

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Miles Lane
On Dec 19, 2007 7:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand > > > > why we would only drain

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-19 Thread Dave Young
On Dec 20, 2007 12:07 AM, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Dave Young wrote: > > > I tested on another machine with kernel 2.6.24-rc2. And the result is > > diffrent again. > > Here is the result: > > > > 1. on 2.6.24-rc2, when I plugin the player the kernel reports be

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 20 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand > > > why we would only drain the pages of this processor and not of all other > > > processors as well. It s

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > We could reexport drain_local_pages() again but then I do not understand > > why we would only drain the pages of this processor and not of all other > > processors as well. It seems that software suspend intend was to flush > > them all right? >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 19 of December 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > It looks like the swsusp_save() calls drain_all_pages() , which calls > > > on_each_cpu() .. On return on_each_cpu() unconditionally enables > > > interrupts so the rest of the resume pr

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Daniel Walker wrote: > > It looks like the swsusp_save() calls drain_all_pages() , which calls > > on_each_cpu() .. On return on_each_cpu() unconditionally enables > > interrupts so the rest of the resume process has interrupt enable > > (which , it looks like, shouldn't happe

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Daniel Walker
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:42 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:06 -0500, Miles Lane wrote: > > [ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image: > > [ 11.827658] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c:561 > > native_smp_call_function_mask() > > [ 11.827661] Pid: 9940, comm: pm-h

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Daniel Walker
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:06 -0500, Miles Lane wrote: > [ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image: > [ 11.827658] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c:561 > native_smp_call_function_mask() > [ 11.827661] Pid: 9940, comm: pm-hibernate Not tainted > 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 #8 > [ 11.827665] [] show

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-19 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Dave Young wrote: > I tested on another machine with kernel 2.6.24-rc2. And the result is > diffrent again. > Here is the result: > > 1. on 2.6.24-rc2, when I plugin the player the kernel reports below messages: > > usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]

2007-12-19 Thread Miles Lane
I discovered that I can use IMAP with GMail now, so I can send messages using Thunderbird and avoid the line wrapping problem. I tried doing a series: suspend-to-disk, suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk Here is the result: [ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image: [ 11.827658] WARNING:

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-18 Thread Dave Young
On Dec 17, 2007 9:14 AM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 11:44 PM, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Dave Young wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > The behaviour of my mp3 player (also act as usb-storage device) seems > > > changed from rc5 to rc5-mm1. >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-18 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:04:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Nobody seems to look after hppfs. I'll resend the fat and hostfs patches to > maintainers for a review, please. It's mine - I'll take a look at it. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:22:21 + David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - inode = ERR_PTR(ret); > > > + return NULL; > > > } else { > > > unlock_new_inode(inode); > > > } >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-18 Thread Dave Young
On Dec 19, 2007 9:22 AM, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - inode = ERR_PTR(ret); > > > + return NULL; > > > } else { > > > unlock_new_inode(inode); > > > } > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-18 Thread David Howells
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - inode = ERR_PTR(ret); > > + return NULL; > > } else { > > unlock_new_inode(inode); > > } > > > > Yup. Nope. The correct fix is to make the various callers use IS_ERR()

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-18 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
(Adding Dave Howells, his name is on iget-stop-isofs-from-using-read_inode.patch) On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:37:32 +0800, Dave Young said: > > I don't mind it failing the mount, but the oops seems excessive. I suspect > > that *somewhere* in that stack trace, we're wanting something like a > > > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - IPv6 throws section mismatches.

2007-12-18 Thread Daniel Lezcano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:40:50 PST, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc5/2.6.24-rc5-mm1/ git-net.patch (I'm guessing one of Daniel's commits, but not sure which one) causes some complaints: LD vmlinux.o MO

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected -- pm-suspend/5800 is trying to acquire lock

2007-12-18 Thread Johannes Berg
> Sorry. GMail doesn't support sending unwrapped text, as far as I can > tell. I will send the log segment to you as an attachment. Also, > when I sent my .config inline to Andrew recently, it tripped his spam > filter. I'll attach it as well. Thanks. This is a bug in iwlwifi. The problem is

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected -- pm-suspend/5800 is trying to acquire lock

2007-12-18 Thread Johannes Berg
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 09:03 -0500, Miles Lane wrote: > I have only seen this happen once, and cannot reproduce it. I'll keep > trying, though. > > Dec 16 22:10:48 syntropy kernel: [ 231.718023] > === Do you have a version that isn't line-wrap

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:37:32 +0800 Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:07:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:56:44 PST, Andrew Morton said: > > > > (Adding Al Viro to the list, he's listed as "file systems" and MAINTAINERS > > doesn't li

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-17 Thread Dave Young
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:07:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:56:44 PST, Andrew Morton said: > > (Adding Al Viro to the list, he's listed as "file systems" and MAINTAINERS > doesn't list 'isofs' anyplace. Will Al or Andrew please vector to whoever > actually does tha

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-17 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:56:44 PST, Andrew Morton said: (Adding Al Viro to the list, he's listed as "file systems" and MAINTAINERS doesn't list 'isofs' anyplace. Will Al or Andrew please vector to whoever actually does that code?) > > I try it again, and it reports it died at the same exact place,

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - wonky disk cache and CDROM behavior...

2007-12-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:44:11 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:40:50 PST, Andrew Morton said: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc5/2.6.24-rc5-mm1/ > > OK, so I'm trying to 'dd' a CD and the drive on the laptop is having issues > readin

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > cat /proc/kpagecount on the other hand - with the change in line 710 > > - locks the box. Sysrq works, changing consoles works, but there is > > no "BUG: soft lockup ..." message. After a while the box becomes > > totaly unresponsive - even caps lock doesn't work, no responses to > > pi

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-17 Thread Matt Mackall
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:39:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:26:11 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:11:49 -0600 > > > > > But as the function doesn't actually show up in you

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 compile failure: usbhid_lookup_quirk

2007-12-17 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > MODPOST 196 modules > > ERROR: "usbhid_lookup_quirk" [drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.ko] > > undefined! > > ERROR: "usbhid_lookup_quirk" [drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.ko] undefined! > > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 > > make: *** [modules] Err

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 compile failure: usbhid_lookup_quirk

2007-12-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:50:40 +0100 jurriaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MODPOST 196 modules > ERROR: "usbhid_lookup_quirk" [drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.ko] > undefined! > ERROR: "usbhid_lookup_quirk" [drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.ko] undefined! > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 > make:

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:26:11 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:11:49 -0600 > > > But as the function doesn't actually show up in your stack trace, > > something else is probably wrong. So I'd also try commentin

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread David Miller
From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:11:49 -0600 > But as the function doesn't actually show up in your stack trace, > something else is probably wrong. So I'd also try commenting out > pieces of that function until it started working. Some piece of state is being indi

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Matt Mackall
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 08:10:10PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: > > > Can you change line 710 of fs/proc/proc_misc.c to: > > > > > > ppage = NULL; > > > > Sure. > > > > > ..and see if it still breaks? > > > > Yes it does - the same way as eariler. Box is locked, processes stuck in D > > s

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-16 Thread Dave Young
On Dec 14, 2007 11:44 PM, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Dave Young wrote: > > > Hi, > > The behaviour of my mp3 player (also act as usb-storage device) seems > > changed from rc5 to rc5-mm1. > > This can't be considered a bug, right? I'm not sure. > It's just that t

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-16 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:36:33 -0800 > The networking bug looks to be around sock_i_ino()'s taking of > sk_callback_lock with softirq's enabled. Perhaps this will fix it. One should be suspicious of any case where write_lock is performed on sk->sk_callbac

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Witam, > > > > cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > > > > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > > > > between consoles. > > > > > > > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... > > > > > > cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box i

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
> > > cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > > > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > > > between consoles. > > > > > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... > > > > cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box is locked - sysrq-w > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Matt Mackall
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:40:53PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: > > cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > > between consoles. > > > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... > > cat /proc/kpagecount pr

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
> cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > between consoles. > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box is locked - sysrq-w sshd trace: __down __down_inte

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello > Will reply soon with correct data. Ok here it goes: cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... sysrq-w shows: syslogd D 0069240c

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
> cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch > between consoles. > > cat process hangs in read(3, ... > > sysrq-w shows: > > syslogd D 0069240c 0 2470 1 > Call Trace: > [0069

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags

2007-12-16 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock. I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch between consoles. cat process hangs in read(3, ... sysrq-w shows: syslogd D 0069240c 0 2470 1 Call Trace: [00692224] [000

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:20:24 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, I got the following at reboot after some tests were finished: > > get_unused_fd: slot 3 not NULL! > get_unised_fd: slot 4 not NULL! > general protection fault: [1] PREEMPT SMP > last sysfs file /sys/class/s

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:55:09 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 15, 2007 3:13 PM, Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 15, 2007 6:13 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-15 Thread Herbert Xu
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My suspicion is that you've hit bad breakage in networking and lockdep just > isn't sufficiently robust to handle what it's being given. > > Can you suggest a way in which others can reproduce this? I can reproduce this now. I suspect it's to do with

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: cat /proc/net/packet -> oops

2007-12-15 Thread Herbert Xu
Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > git-ubi.patch > GOOD > # > git-net.patch > BAD > ipsec-fix-reversed-icmp6-policy-check.patch > > but this seems to be far from precise :) I suspect namespace borkage. But just because you pin-pointed my patch I'll try to track it down :) Cheers,

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: cat /proc/net/packet -> oops

2007-12-15 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, As one of usual tests I run the following script: for i in `find /proc -type f`; do echo -n "cat $i > /dev/null ... "; cat $i > /dev/null; echo "done"; done This time the culprit is /proc/net/packet. cat process gets killed $ cat /proc/net/packet Segment

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-15 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
FWIW, I got the following at reboot after some tests were finished: get_unused_fd: slot 3 not NULL! get_unised_fd: slot 4 not NULL! general protection fault: [1] PREEMPT SMP last sysfs file /sys/class/scsh_host/host1/link_power_management_policy and that's all. -- To unsubscribe from this li

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-15 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Andrew Morton wrote, On 12/15/2007 12:13 PM: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> I applied the patch and then tried my test again. This time my system >> locked up. >> Perhaps I should open a new thread for this, since the problem looks >> prett

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:59!

2007-12-15 Thread John Stoffel
John> Just fired up 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 on a Dual CPU PIII 550mhz system John> with 2gb of RAM. Got the following error. Let me know if you John> need more details or want me to run tests or make changes. John> Looks like something in the SCSI st driver, which makes sense John> since I have a pair of

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-15 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Andrew Morton wrote, On 12/15/2007 12:13 PM: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Dec 14, 2007 6:36 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:13:21 -0500 >>> "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... Pid: 6944, c

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.c:598: error: conflicting type qualifiers for ‘logo_linux_clut 224’

2007-12-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:16:13 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 2.0 required) > > pts rule name description > -- -- > 3.1 UNIQUE_WORDS BODY: Mess

Re: [2.6.24-rc5-mm1] Why CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=m makes \\\"#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM\\\" false?

2007-12-15 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Dec 14 2007 15:15, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >Hello. > >Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think that this is a change from the recent past. > >Oh, it is my mistake. > >I found that choosing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=m makes >impossible to pass an initrd image since >populate_rootfs() in ini

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 6:36 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:13:21 -0500 > > "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry Andrew, I don't know who to forward this problem to.

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-14 Thread Herbert Xu
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd say you hit a networking locking bug and then when trying to report > that bug, lockdep crashed. > > The networking bug looks to be around sock_i_ino()'s taking of > sk_callback_lock with softirq's enabled. Perhaps this will fix it. > > diff -puN

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:59!

2007-12-14 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:05:56 -0500 "John Stoffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just fired up 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 on a Dual CPU PIII 550mhz system with 2gb > of RAM. Got the following error. Let me know if you need more > details or want me to run tests or make changes. Looks like somethi

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 6:36 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:13:21 -0500 > > "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry Andrew, I don't know who to forward this problem to.

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-R} usage.

2007-12-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:13:21 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry Andrew, I don't know who to forward this problem to. > > I tried running: find /proc | xargs cat > and got this: > > = > [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] > 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 #26 > --

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-14 Thread David Miller
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:08:07 +0800 > [UDP]: Move udp_stats_in6 into net/ipv4/udp.c > > Now that external users may increment the counters directly, we need to > ensure that udp_stats_in6 is always available. Otherwise we'd either > have to requrie the exte

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-14 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Dave Young wrote: > Hi, > The behaviour of my mp3 player (also act as usb-storage device) seems > changed from rc5 to rc5-mm1. This can't be considered a bug, right? It's just that the player changed from one slightly non-standard behavior to a different slightly non-stand

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-14 Thread Dhaval Giani
Hi Andrew, I hit this just now. Not sure if I can reproduce it though. WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2533 tcp_fastretrans_alert() Pid: 4624, comm: yield Not tainted 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 #5 [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x22 [] show_trace+0xd/0xf [] dump_stack+0x57/0x5e [] tcp_fastretrans_alert+0xde

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-14 Thread Gregory Haskins
>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 4:49 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:58:02 +0530 Gautham R Shenoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:40:50AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> > >> > >> > > ft

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 ath5k build issue

2007-12-14 Thread Nick Kossifidis
2007/12/14, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Dec 10, 2007 1:55 AM, Nick Kossifidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007/12/7, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 build failed at drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c for some > > > inline functions like this: > >

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:58:02 +0530 Gautham R Shenoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:40:50AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc5/2.6.24-rc5-mm1/ > > > > - If something goes wrong wi

Re: (was Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1) crypto/authenc.c select symbol in Kconfig

2007-12-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:46:37PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > which fails because crypto_hash_type is declared in crypto/hash.c. You might > wanna > fix it like so: > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch applied. Thanks for picking this up. > --- crypto/Kconfig.ori

Re: [2.6.24-rc5-mm1] Why CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=m makes \\\"#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM\\\" false?

2007-12-13 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Hello. Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think that this is a change from the recent past. Oh, it is my mistake. I found that choosing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=m makes impossible to pass an initrd image since populate_rootfs() in init/initramfs.c omits code for checking whether the ima

Re: [2.6.24-rc5-mm1] Why CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=m makes \"#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM\" false?

2007-12-13 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:04:19 +0900 Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello. > > I found that > > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=m > > in my .config makes > > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM > > false. > > I guess something is wrong with .config parsing. Look at include/linux/autoconf.h. You should see a line like: #

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-13 Thread Dave Young
Hi, The behaviour of my mp3 player (also act as usb-storage device) seems changed from rc5 to rc5-mm1. : = usb 1-7: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 7 usb 1-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice scsi4 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usb-storage: device

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.c:598: error: conflicting type qualifiers for ‘logo_linux_clut224’

2007-12-13 Thread Miles Lane
On Dec 13, 2007 8:57 PM, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:16:13 -0500 Miles Lane wrote: > > > CC drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.o > > drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.c:598: error: conflicting type > > qualifiers for 'logo_linux_clut224' > > includ

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-13 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:45:54AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Benjamin Thery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:01:34 +0100 > > > The problem comes from the new macro UDPX_INC_STATS_BH introduced > > by Herbert, which was a nice addition to increment the correct > > UDP MIB d

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.c:598: error: conflicting type qualifiers for ‘logo_linux_ clut224’

2007-12-13 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:16:13 -0500 Miles Lane wrote: > CC drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.o > drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.c:598: error: conflicting type > qualifiers for 'logo_linux_clut224' > include/linux/linux_logo.h:47: error: previous declaration of > 'logo_linux_clut22

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:58:02 +0530 Gautham R Shenoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:40:50AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc5/2.6.24-rc5-mm1/ > > > > - If something goes wrong wi

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 regression - kernel warning on tcp_fastretrans_alert()

2007-12-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:26:21 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, Hi. Please do try to cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on net-related problems. Doing so will often save multiple hours latency and will optimise away one entire email (ie: this one). > Following call trace is seen

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:07:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:01:34PM +0100, Benjamin Thery wrote: > > The problem comes from the new macro UDPX_INC_STATS_BH introduced > > by Herbert, which was a nice addition to increment the correct > > UDP MIB depending on the s

(was Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1) crypto/authenc.c select symbol in Kconfig

2007-12-13 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:40:50AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: i get here: LD vmlinux SYSMAP System.map SYSMAP .tmp_System.map Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 226 modules ERROR: "crypto_hash_type" [crypto/authenc.ko] undefined! make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 make: *** [

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-13 Thread David Miller
From: Benjamin Thery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:01:34 +0100 > The problem comes from the new macro UDPX_INC_STATS_BH introduced > by Herbert, which was a nice addition to increment the correct > UDP MIB depending on the socket family, but unfortunately > the use of this macro

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - build failures due to kobject changes

2007-12-13 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:46:02PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > The kernel build fails, due to kobjects changes > > drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c: In function ???ehca_module_init???: > drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:947: error: ???struct device_driver??? > has

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 kobject changes broken with hvcs driver on powerpc - regression

2007-12-13 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:29:43PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > Hi, > > The kernel build fails with following error message > > drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function 'hvcs_open': > drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark > make[2]: *** [drivers/char/hvcs.o] E

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-13 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:01:34PM +0100, Benjamin Thery wrote: > The problem comes from the new macro UDPX_INC_STATS_BH introduced > by Herbert, which was a nice addition to increment the correct > UDP MIB depending on the socket family, but unfortunately > the use of this macro from kernel code

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 - build failures due to kobject changes

2007-12-13 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Hi Andrew, The kernel build fails, due to kobjects changes drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c: In function ‘ehca_module_init’: drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:947: error: ‘struct device_driver’ has no member named ‘kobj’ drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c: In function ‘ehca_module

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-13 Thread Benjamin Thery
The problem comes from the new macro UDPX_INC_STATS_BH introduced by Herbert, which was a nice addition to increment the correct UDP MIB depending on the socket family, but unfortunately the use of this macro from kernel code (I mean code not compiled as module) requires that IPv6 is also compil

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 regression - kernel warning on tcp_fastretrans_alert()

2007-12-13 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Hi Andrew, Following call trace is seen in 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 kernel also,it was reported for 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/6/22 ls21b kernel: [ 7530.313408] WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2533 tcp_fastretrans_alert() ls21b kernel: [ 7530.354051] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tain

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1

2007-12-13 Thread Pierre Peiffer
Hi, My config does not link any more: ... CHK include/linux/compile.h UPD include/linux/compile.h CC init/version.o LD init/built-in.o LD .tmp_vmlinux1 net/built-in.o: In function `xs_udp_data_ready': /home/peifferp/containers/kernel/linux-2.6.24-rc5-mm1/n

Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 kobject changes broken with hvcs driver on powerpc - regression

2007-12-13 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Hi, The kernel build fails with following error message drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function 'hvcs_open': drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark make[2]: *** [drivers/char/hvcs.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs This driver was broken in 2

  1   2   >