Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:35:18 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can not contact with Len for several days, while the oops on battery > seems quite important. > It also seem to behave well in -mm tree (as part of Len's acpi-test). > Will you send this patch to Linus without

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-13 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Andrew, I can not contact with Len for several days, while the oops on battery seems quite important. It also seem to behave well in -mm tree (as part of Len's acpi-test). Will you send this patch to Linus without approval from Len or should I? Thanks, Alex. Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 09 N

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:36:43 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > A> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)] > >> ACPI: Battery: remove cycl

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-09 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Andrew Morton wrote: A> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)] ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal. From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> get_property() should not cal

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-08 Thread Andrew Morton
A> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)] > ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal. > > From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > get_property() should not call battery_up

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-08 Thread Johannes Weiner
Hi Alex, On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:35:23PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call > >>acpi_battery_update() at all? > > > >Alex? > Do

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-08 Thread Johannes Weiner
Hi, On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:11:53PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call > >>acpi_battery_update() at all? > > > >Alex? > If someo

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-08 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote: Hi, is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call acpi_battery_update() at all? Alex? Do you mean "why should it call _whole_ battery update?" ? get_state should be sufficient in order to not

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-08 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote: Hi, is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call acpi_battery_update() at all? Alex? If someone wants to read stale values, he could comment out acpi_battery_update. Regards, Alex. - To unsu

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hi, > > is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call > acpi_battery_update() at all? Alex? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More maj

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-08 Thread Johannes Weiner
Hi, is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call acpi_battery_update() at all? Hannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.h

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 5 of November 2007, Michael (rabenkind) Brandstetter wrote: > Am Sonntag, 4. November 2007 14:17:23 schrieben Sie: > > On Sunday, 4 of November 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Friday, 2 November 2007 00:14, Andrew

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-04 Thread Michael (rabenkind) Brandstetter
Am Sonntag, 4. November 2007 14:17:23 schrieben Sie: > On Sunday, 4 of November 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, 2 November 2007 00:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100 Hello! > > [OOPS re

Re: *SPAM* Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 4 of November 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 2 November 2007 00:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100 > [OOPS removed] > > > > > > Did any earlier kernels do this? In other words,

Re: *SPAM* Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 2 November 2007 00:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100 [OOPS removed] > > > > Did any earlier kernels do this? In other words, do you believe that this > > is a bug which we added after 2.6.23 wa

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 2 November 2007 00:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > sometime on resuming from s2ram my laptop spew the following oops. > > Config, dmesg etc are at: > > > > http://www.dea.icai.upcom

Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100 Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > sometime on resuming from s2ram my laptop spew the following oops. > Config, dmesg etc are at: > > http://www.dea.icai.upcomillas.es/romano/linux/info/2624rc1_6/ > > [3.475386] Oops: [#1]

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 oops

2007-10-25 Thread Sid Boyce
FUJITA Tomonori wrote: Jens, I should have CC'ed to you. On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:22:02 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:40:00 +0100 Sid Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: x86_64 dual, gcc version 4.2.2 (SUSE Linux). [ cut here ] ker

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 oops

2007-10-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On Thu, Oct 25 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Jens, I should have CC'ed to you. > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:22:02 +0900 > FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:40:00 +0100 > > Sid Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > x86_64 dual, gcc version 4.2.2 (SUSE Lin

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 oops

2007-10-24 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
Jens, I should have CC'ed to you. On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:22:02 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:40:00 +0100 > Sid Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > x86_64 dual, gcc version 4.2.2 (SUSE Linux). > > [ cut here ] > > kernel BUG a

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 oops

2007-10-24 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:40:00 +0100 Sid Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > x86_64 dual, gcc version 4.2.2 (SUSE Linux). > [ cut here ] > kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:50! > invalid opcode: [1] SMP > CPU 1 > Modules linked in: ub crc_itu_t hwmon cdrom soundco