Thanks for the pointers, guys. It took a while for me to figure out what
got wrong to foul up UML, but the bug and fix are trivial (posting now).
Some of the testing I thought had got done clearly wasn't done, since
PTRACE_SETREGS was 100% busticated for 32-bit processes calling ptrace on
x86_64 k
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:20:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Bisected it down to
>
> good e7b5e11eaaa8ef93a34e68016de51152d0d62911
> bad bde6f5f59c2b2b48a7a849c129d5b48838fe77ee
>
> I strongly suspect it's one of the ptrace cleanup patches. Roland,
> could you please have a look?
I agree.
> > > > - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
> > > >other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
> > >
> > > What does it do?
> >
> > See below.
>
> This bug seems to have made it to mainline as well, starting with
> -rc1. Any ideas? Should I start bisecting?
> > > - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
> > >other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
> >
> > What does it do?
>
> See below.
This bug seems to have made it to mainline as well, starting with
-rc1. Any ideas? Should I start bisecting?
Thanks,
Miklos
>
> > - strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
> >press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
> >seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
> >noticable in -mm
>
> Do you have CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled?, if so, doe
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > What does it do?
> >
> > See below.
>
> > [0.42] Checking host MADV_REMOVE support...<3>MADV_REMOVE failed,
> > err = -38
>
> Where'd MADV_REMOVE go? I have it on 2.6.24.
Oh, I always get this message. Looking cl
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > What does it do?
>
> See below.
> [0.42] Checking host MADV_REMOVE support...<3>MADV_REMOVE failed, err
> = -38
Where'd MADV_REMOVE go? I have it on 2.6.24.
> [0.42] Failed to get registers from stub, errno =
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:46:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:43:45 +0100, Miklos Szeredi said:
> > I'm trying out 2.6.24-mm1 on my work laptop (T60), and generally it
>
> > - mounting isofs always results in an empty directory
>
> I hit this in 24-rc8-mm1, and bisected i
On Friday 15 February 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
> > >other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
> >
> > What does it do?
>
> See below.
>
> >
> > Any chance you can bisect it?
>
> It would be a bit painful, because
> > - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
> >other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
>
> What does it do?
See below.
>
> Any chance you can bisect it?
It would be a bit painful, because this is the only machine I can use.
I much prefer bisecting UML kernels
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:43:45PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
>other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
What does it do?
Any chance you can bisect it?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at lin
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> the register dump looks OK as far as I can see. Since initialization
>> works OK and the adapter seems to be setup OK reading from the
>> register dump, I'm not sure at all what is going on.
>>
>> can you try manually ifup-ing the device and running tcpdump? do you
>> see p
> the register dump looks OK as far as I can see. Since initialization
> works OK and the adapter seems to be setup OK reading from the
> register dump, I'm not sure at all what is going on.
>
> can you try manually ifup-ing the device and running tcpdump? do you
> see packets coming in?
Well it
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> OK. can you download, install and run `ethregs -i eth0` (from
>> e1000.sf.net) and send me the output? I'll compare with a known
>> working t60 I have here and see if anything shows up.
>
> OK, attached.
>
>> Also, post me the dmesg from after the adapter fails to load
>>
And here's the NetworkManager side of the log:
==
Feb 15 12:27:30 tucsk NetworkManager: starting...
Feb 15 12:27:30 tucsk NetworkManager: [1203074850.429242]
nm_system_device_get_system_config(): found config
'/etc/syscon
> OK. can you download, install and run `ethregs -i eth0` (from
> e1000.sf.net) and send me the output? I'll compare with a known
> working t60 I have here and see if anything shows up.
OK, attached.
> Also, post me the dmesg from after the adapter fails to load
> properly.
Hmm, nothing in dmesg
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> - network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
>>>e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
>>>other problems.
>
> It does seem to be using MSI interrupts:
>
>CPU0 CPU1
> 0:2994380 1 I
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:43:45 +0100, Miklos Szeredi said:
> I'm trying out 2.6.24-mm1 on my work laptop (T60), and generally it
> - mounting isofs always results in an empty directory
I hit this in 24-rc8-mm1, and bisected it down to
iget-stop-isofs-from-using-read_inode-fix-2.patch
Apparently i
Kok, Auke wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> - network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
>>e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
>>other problems.
>
> Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you are not
> using
> MSI
> > - network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
> >e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
> >other problems.
>
> Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you
> are not using MSI interrupts (e.g. booting with pci=nomsi o
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> - network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
>e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
>other problems.
Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you are not using
MSI interrupts (e.g. booting with p
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> > - strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
> >press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
> >seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
> >noticable in -mm
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> - strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
>press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
>seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
>noticable in -mm
Do you ha
23 matches
Mail list logo
