On Monday, 19 March 2007 16:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > >> > > > I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume
> > >> > > > from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the
> > >> > > > changes to ACPI and test it?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This is with CONFIG_
> >> > > > I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume
> >> > > > from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the
> >> > > > changes to ACPI and test it?
> >> > >
> >> > > This is with CONFIG_KVM=n?
> >> >
> >> > Yes.
> >>
> >> I've tried with CONFIG_KVM=n
> Quoting Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
>
> On 3/6/07, Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/5/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > I have the sa
On 3/6/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
>
> On 3/6/07, Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/5/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECT
On 3/6/07, Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/5/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume
> > from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the
> > changes to ACPI and test it?
>
> This is with CONFIG
On 3/5/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume
> from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the
> changes to ACPI and test it?
This is with CONFIG_KVM=n?
Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:45:35AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >with 2.6.20, pressing Fn/F4 generates an ACPI event and triggers suspend
> >to RAM.
> >
> >On 2.6.21-rc2, after resume (when the box is accessible from network),
> >pressing
On 3/1/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
with 2.6.20, pressing Fn/F4 generates an ACPI event and triggers suspend to RAM.
On 2.6.21-rc2, after resume (when the box is accessible from network),
pressing Fn/F4 again does not seem to have any effect.
I have the same problem on my
>Quoting Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)
>
>On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 23:13 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >Subject: ThinkPad T60: no screen after suspend to RAM
>> >References : http://lkml.
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 23:13 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >Subject: ThinkPad T60: no screen after suspend to RAM
> >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391
> >Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Status : unknown
>Subject: ThinkPad T60: no screen after suspend to RAM
>References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391
>Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Status : unknown
Just reproduced this in -rc2.
Another thing I noticed:
with 2.6.20, p
27 Şub 2007 Sal tarihinde, S.Çağlar Onur şunları yazmıştı:
> 27 Şub 2007 Sal tarihinde, Fabio Comolli şunları yazmıştı:
> > Confirmed, although the problem I see is probably different from
> > Ismael's one: in my case /proc/acpi/adapter/AC is present but
> > kpowersave does not work (it works in 2
27 Şub 2007 Sal tarihinde, Fabio Comolli şunları yazmıştı:
> Confirmed, although the problem I see is probably different from
> Ismael's one: in my case /proc/acpi/adapter/AC is present but
> kpowersave does not work (it works in 2.6.20).
>
> The only file I seem to be missing is /proc/acpi/info,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:00:29 +0200 (EET)
Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Subject: ata-piix ACPI errors (40/80 pin cable mix)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/159
> > Submitter : Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Status : unknown
>
> Still appears, but this doe
> Subject: ata-piix ACPI errors (40/80 pin cable mix)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/159
> Submitter : Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status : unknown
Still appears, but this does not seem to be 40/80 pin cable problem to
be but rather ata-piix calling some acpi methods
15 matches
Mail list logo
