Re: 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS

2007-04-27 Thread Klaus Strebel
Eric Sandeen schrieb: > Jesper Juhl wrote: >> On 26/04/07, David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Known false positive - XFS doesn't have the annotations needed for >>> this yet; we've got a patch that will probably make it's way into 6.5.22 >>> that >>> should fix most of these issues. >

Re: 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS

2007-04-26 Thread Eric Sandeen
Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 26/04/07, David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Known false positive - XFS doesn't have the annotations needed for >> this yet; we've got a patch that will probably make it's way into 6.5.22 that >> should fix most of these issues. wow... 6.5.22 do we really have

Re: 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS

2007-04-26 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 26/04/07, David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > Hi, > > For your information : > > Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it. . > ==

Re: 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS

2007-04-25 Thread David Chinner
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > Hi, > > For your information : > > Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS > filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it. . > = > [ IN