On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:05:52PM +, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:31:08PM +0300, Tomasz Kvarsin wrote:
> > I try to compile and got:
> Frederik
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcupreempt.c b/kernel/rcupreempt.c
> index
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:49:50AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > static int
> > > svc_pool_map_init_percpu(struct svc_pool_map *m)
> > > {
> > > - unsigned int maxpools = nr_node_ids;
> > > + unsigned int maxpools = num_online_cpus();
> > >
Thomas Gleixner napisał(a):
> On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 12:02 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> I guess that it's caused by some timer changes (added Thomas and Ingo to
>> CC), which confuse the softlockup detector sense of time?
>
> Does the patch below fix this ?
>
I had similar bug while resume, thi
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:31:08PM +0300, Tomasz Kvarsin wrote:
> I try to compile and got:
>
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> CHK include/linux/compile.h
> CC kernel/rcupreempt.o
> kernel/rcupreempt.c: In function 'rcupreempt_try_flip_state_nam
Le 29.01.2007 09:12, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm2/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm2/
- Dropped git-block due to CFQ breakage
Nice, reiser4
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > static int
> > svc_pool_map_init_percpu(struct svc_pool_map *m)
> > {
> > - unsigned int maxpools = nr_node_ids;
> > + unsigned int maxpools = num_online_cpus();
> > unsigned int pidx = 0;
> > unsigned int cpu;
> > int err;
>
> Than
I have a consistent problem running 'make modules_install' after compiling. The
directory structure forms in /lib/modules, but no modules install. This problem
showed up under -rc6-mm1 and -rc6-mm2, but not -rc6. I'm hoping somebody has
hit this before, otherwise it's git-bisect time.
Process i
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:21:41 +
Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 12:12:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm2/
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> The svc_pool_map_init_percpu() s
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 17:22 +0100, Karsten Wiese wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with dynticks and highres_timers enabled, cpufreq_ondemand makes mess here on
> an AMD64 UP.
> cpufreq_ondemand assumes that jiffies advance at exactly the same pace as the
> sum of all kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.* members.
> This isn't
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I guess that it's caused by some timer changes (added Thomas and Ingo to
> > CC), which confuse the softlockup detector sense of time?
> Does the patch below fix this ?
It does.
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsu
Hi,
with dynticks and highres_timers enabled, cpufreq_ondemand makes mess here on
an AMD64 UP.
cpufreq_ondemand assumes that jiffies advance at exactly the same pace as the
sum of all kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.* members.
This isn't the case here as dmesg output from patch below shows.
Is cpufreq_ond
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 12:02 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> I guess that it's caused by some timer changes (added Thomas and Ingo to
> CC), which confuse the softlockup detector sense of time?
Does the patch below fix this ?
tglx
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc6-mm/kernel/time/tick-common.c
=
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 12:12:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm2/
>
Hi,
The svc_pool_map_init_percpu() should get maxpool from the number of
online cpus, not the number of nodes. The following BUG i
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm2/
I just got this on suspend/resume cycle on my IBM T42p
pcspkr pcspkr: EARLY resume
vesafb vesafb.0: EARLY resume
serial8250 serial8250: EARLY resume
i8042 i8042: EARLY resume
platform floppy.0: EARL
14 matches
Mail list logo
