On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My swap is on,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> > >
> > >
> > > My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:29:51PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Good luck,
> > > > Jurriaan
> > > > --
> > > > > What does ELF stand for (in respect to Linux?)
> > >
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:29:51PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Good luck,
> > > Jurriaan
> > > --
> > > > What does ELF stand for (in respect to Linux?)
> > > ELF is the first rock group that Ronnie James Dio performed wit
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Good luck,
> > Jurriaan
> > --
> > > What does ELF stand for (in respect to Linux?)
> > ELF is the first rock group that Ronnie James Dio performed with back in
> > the early 1970's. In constrast, a.out is a misspelling of the Fren
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:48:07AM -0500
> >
> > What about all of the changes with NAT? I see that it operates on
> > level-3/network wise, I enabled that and backward compatiblity support as
> > we
From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:48:07AM -0500
>
> What about all of the changes with NAT? I see that it operates on
> level-3/network wise, I enabled that and backward compatiblity support as
> well, but when my iptables rules kick in, it says no such drive
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> >
> >
> > My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
> > to 2.6.17.13 as it does not recognize the NICs in my machine correctly
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> >
> >
> > My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
> > to 2.6.17.13 as it does not recognize the NICs in my machine correctly
From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
>
>
> My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
> to 2.6.17.13 as it does not recognize the NICs in my machine correctly and
> the Alsa Intel HD Audio driver has bugs etc, I guess
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Avuton Olrich wrote:
>
> > On 1/20/07, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Perhaps its time to back to a stable (2.6.17.13 kernel)?
> > >
> > > Anyway, when I run a cp 18gb_file 18gb_file.2 on a dual raptor sw raid
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Avuton Olrich wrote:
> On 1/20/07, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps its time to back to a stable (2.6.17.13 kernel)?
> >
> > Anyway, when I run a cp 18gb_file 18gb_file.2 on a dual raptor sw raid1
> > partition, the OOM killer goes into effect and kills a
On 1/20/07, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps its time to back to a stable (2.6.17.13 kernel)?
Anyway, when I run a cp 18gb_file 18gb_file.2 on a dual raptor sw raid1
partition, the OOM killer goes into effect and kills almost all my
processes.
Completely 100% reproducible.
Does
13 matches
Mail list logo
