Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had > > to poke SysRq-O. > > hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change >

Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had > > to poke SysRq-O. > > hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change >

Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had > to poke SysRq-O. hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change anything in this area (in theory). Ingo - To unsubscribe from