Re: 2.6.19-rt1: max latencies with jackd

2006-12-01 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > could you try the patch below? It changes trace entries to be measured > via get_cycles() again [which should be must faster than pmtimer on your > CPU], but keeps the latency tracing tim

Re: 2.6.19-rt1: max latencies with jackd

2006-12-01 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, I finally have a rebuilt kernel with latency tracing enabled, > > a jackd with the proper prctl incantations built in and I'm getting > > some (hopefully) meaningful data. >

Re: 2.6.19-rt1: max latencies with jackd

2006-12-01 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ingo, I finally have a rebuilt kernel with latency tracing enabled, > a jackd with the proper prctl incantations built in and I'm getting > some (hopefully) meaningful data. ok. I'm first trying to understand what is happening. For examp