Ingo Molnar wrote:
* K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On X86 -51-36 won't build with CONFIG_BLOCKER=Y without the attached
patch.
thanks. I changed the include to asm/rtc.h, this should give what PPC
wants to have, and should work on all architectures. Released the -37
patch.
* K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On X86 -51-36 won't build with CONFIG_BLOCKER=Y without the attached
> patch.
thanks. I changed the include to asm/rtc.h, this should give what PPC
wants to have, and should work on all architectures. Released the -37
patch.
Ingo
-
To u
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* john cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ingo,
Attached is a patch for 51-28 which brings PPC up to date for
2.6.12 PREEMPT_RT. My goal was to get a more recent vintage of this
work building and minimally booting for PPC. Yet this has been stable
even under our inter
* john cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo,
> Attached is a patch for 51-28 which brings PPC up to date for
> 2.6.12 PREEMPT_RT. My goal was to get a more recent vintage of this
> work building and minimally booting for PPC. Yet this has been stable
> even under our internal stress
Gene Heskett wrote:
Humm, I wondering out loud if this is the video dma failure in tvtime?
Anyway, it applied cleanly over -33, and is building now, set for
mode=4.
On i386 the hw_irq_controller.end() handler
conditionally calls the function registered
for the hw_irq_controller.enable() handl
On Thursday 21 July 2005 07:45, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Thursday 21 July 2005 00:48, john cooper wrote:
>>Ingo,
>> Attached is a patch for 51-28 which brings PPC
>>up to date for 2.6.12 PREEMPT_RT. My goal was to
>>get a more recent vintage of this work building and
>>minimally booting for PPC
On Thursday 21 July 2005 00:48, john cooper wrote:
>Ingo,
> Attached is a patch for 51-28 which brings PPC
>up to date for 2.6.12 PREEMPT_RT. My goal was to
>get a more recent vintage of this work building and
>minimally booting for PPC. Yet this has been stable
>even under our internal stres
7 matches
Mail list logo