Andrew Morton wrote:
(Please do reply-to-all)
Jindrich Makovicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
For me, power down stopped working since the introduction of softlo
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:18:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thing is, CRYPTO_AES on only selectable on x86.
> >
> > You're thinking about CRYPTO_AES_586. But looking at crypto/Kconfig,
> > the dependencies are a bit weird:
> >
> > config
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:41:50PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>>Thing is, CRYPTO_AES on only selectable on x86.
> >>
> >>You're thinking about CRYPTO_AES_586. But looking at crypto/Kconfig,
> >>the dependencies are a bit weird
(Please do reply-to-all)
Jindrich Makovicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
> > swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
>
> For me, power down stopped working since the introduction of
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
For me, power down stopped working since the introduction of softlockup
detection. After disabling CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP, powerdown works fine.
--
Jindric
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:41:50PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thing is, CRYPTO_AES on only selectable on x86.
You're thinking about CRYPTO_AES_586. But looking at crypto/Kconfig,
the dependencies are a bit weird:
conf
Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thing is, CRYPTO_AES on only selectable on x86.
You're thinking about CRYPTO_AES_586. But looking at crypto/Kconfig,
the dependencies are a bit weird:
config CRYPTO_AES
tristate "AES cipher algorithms"
depends on CRYPT
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Would be better to just do:
> >
> > config CRYPTO_AES
> > select CRYPTO_AES_586 if (X86 && !X86_64)
> > select CRYPTO_AES_OTHER if !(X86 && !X86_64)
> >
> > and hide CRYPTO_AES_586 and CRYPTO_AES_OTHER from the outside world.
>
>
> http://w
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:12:04PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:43:04AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >>
> >>>+ select CRYPTO
> >>> select CRYPTO_AES
> >>> ---help---
> >>> Include software based cipher suites in suppor
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thing is, CRYPTO_AES on only selectable on x86.
>
> You're thinking about CRYPTO_AES_586. But looking at crypto/Kconfig,
> the dependencies are a bit weird:
>
> config CRYPTO_AES
> tristate "AES cipher algorithms"
> depends on
Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:43:04AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
+ select CRYPTO
select CRYPTO_AES
---help---
Include software based cipher suites in support of IEEE 802.11i
(aka TGi, WPA, WPA2, WPA
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:43:04AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >>
> >>>+ select CRYPTO
> >>> select CRYPTO_AES
> >>> ---help---
> >>> Include software based cipher suites in support of IEEE 802.11i
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:43:04AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
+ select CRYPTO
select CRYPTO_AES
---help---
Include software based cipher suites in support of IEEE 802.11i
(aka TGi, WPA, WPA2, WPA-PSK, etc.) for use with CCMP enabled
networks.
@@ -54,10 +5
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:43:04AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >+select CRYPTO
> > select CRYPTO_AES
> > ---help---
> > Include software based cipher suites in support of IEEE 802.11i
> > (aka TGi, WPA, WPA2, WPA-PSK, etc.) for use with CCMP enabled
> >
Adrian Bunk wrote:
+ select CRYPTO
select CRYPTO_AES
---help---
Include software based cipher suites in support of IEEE 802.11i
(aka TGi, WPA, WPA2, WPA-PSK, etc.) for use with CCMP enabled
networks.
@@ -54,10 +55,11 @@
"ieee80211_crypt_ccmp".
config IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP
tristate
Hi!
> > > Relocating pagedir |
> > > Reading image data (8157 pages): 100% 8157 done.
> > > Stopping tasks: |
> > > Freeing memory... done (0 pages freed)
> > > Freezing CPUs (at 1)...Sleeping in:
> > > [] dump_stack+0x19/0x20
> > > [] smp_pause+0x1f/0x54
> >
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can fix disk going yo-yo without switching pm_message_t to struct,
> but will have to back parts of that later. Do you want patch?
No thanks, I was just pointing it out. It sounds like you have it under
control.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > Resume on SMP locks up.
>
> Does it work on UP kernel on same hardware?
yup.
> NMI watchdog is problem
> for suspend, it takes long to do various phases. Can you disable it
> for testing?
Will try to remember to do that.
> > Relocating pag
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I threw it together to test a specific code path, and the fact it
> > fails in software suspend is actually almost confirmation that I am on
> > the right track. This actually fixed the case I was testing.
> >
> > In this case the failure is simply be
Hi!
> btw, suspend is a bit messy. The disk spins down. Then up. Then down
> again. And:
Here's preview patch to make disk not do stupid yo-yo. Please do not
apply (it will probably not apply cleanly anyway).
I can fix disk going yo-yo without switching pm_message_t to struct,
but will have
Hi!
> btw, suspend is a bit messy. The disk spins down. Then up. Then down
> again. And:
Yes, this is going to be properly solved by switching pm_message_t to
struct (preview patch attached, EVENT will become .event, this is just
for me). I could do some hack to make disk not go up-down-up (a
Hi!
> > > In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
> > > swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
> >
> > Binary searching indicates that this is due to
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/broken-out/acpi_p
Hi!
> > Yes, the patch is very ugly. If something like this needs to be done,
> > then perhaps acpi should properly register into driver model and do
> > the work there. This will also mean code will be called consistently.
>
> I totally agree. Do you have an example of how a non-device
> can do
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, the patch is very ugly. If something like this needs to be done,
> then perhaps acpi should properly register into driver model and do
> the work there. This will also mean code will be called consistently.
I totally agree. Do you have an example o
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
> > swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
>
> Binary searching indicates that this is due to
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/
Hi!
> Resume on SMP locks up.
Does it work on UP kernel on same hardware? NMI watchdog is problem
for suspend, it takes long to do various phases. Can you disable it
for testing?
Pavel
> Relocating pagedir |
> Reading image data (8
Hi!
> > In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
> > swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
>
> Binary searching indicates that this is due to
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/broken-out/acpi_power_off-b
Hi!
> btw, suspend is a bit messy. The disk spins down. Then up. Then down
> again. And:
Yes, that's known, pm_message_t needs to become struct to solve disk
pingpong properly.
> Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2082
> in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1
Resume on SMP locks up.
Relocating pagedir |
Reading image data (8157 pages): 100% 8157 done.
Stopping tasks: |
Freeing memory... done (0 pages freed)
Freezing CPUs (at 1)...Sleeping in:
[] dump_stack+0x19/0x20
[] smp_pause+0x1f/0x54
[] smp_call_function_i
btw, suspend is a bit messy. The disk spins down. Then up. Then down
again. And:
Stopping tasks: ==|
Freeing memory... done (7069 pages freed)
swsusp: Need to copy 7847 pages
swsusp: critical section/: done (7879 pages copi
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
> swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
Binary searching indicates that this is due to
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc5/2.6.11-rc5-mm1/
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:48:20 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Symptoms: Running '/etc/init.d/pcmcia start' bombs - cardmgr goes into
> a loop spewing repeated 'Common memory region at 0x0: Generic or SRAM'
> messages. In the dmesg, we find:
> [4294859.369000] cs: unable to map card memory!
> [429
Le 01.03.2005 00:17, Pavel Machek a écrit :
Hi!
In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
Pavel
Hello,
I noticed this behaviour, too. Can't remember if it came with
2.6.11-rc3-mm2 or with 2.6.11-rc4-mm1. Didn't try an
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:22:26 +0100, Dominik Brodowski said:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:48:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A full -rc4-mm1 fails, *as does* a -rc4-mm1 with all the following patches
> > -R'ed:
...
> > broken-out/pcmcia-bridge-resource-management-fix.patch
> > So the
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:48:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Symptoms: Running '/etc/init.d/pcmcia start' bombs - cardmgr goes into
> a loop spewing repeated 'Common memory region at 0x0: Generic or SRAM'
> messages. In the dmesg, we find:
>
> [4294764.989000] <6>cs: IO port probe 0xc00
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 04:48:10PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> - aren't the "if defined(__x86_64__)" wrong for other 64bit
> architectures?
Yes. Having arch or 64bit ifdefs is pretty wrong pretty much always.
In one case it's only used to make a typedef a 32bit or 64bit integeger,
that should b
On Thursday 24 February 2005 19:06, J.A. Magallon wrote:
>
> On 02.24, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:12, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ftp://ftp.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:25:39 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could someone try this?
>
> Let's turn that into a real patch.
>
> --- 25/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c~ide_init_disk-fixWed Feb 23 16:24:44
> 2005
> +++ 25-akpm/driv
On 02.24, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:12, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:42:24PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> I do need device-mapper, since I put /usr and /var on LVM filesystems. I
> use ptkcdvd to copy data to CD-RW. I can remove this one.
>
> Anyway, this patch from Andrew fixed the problem :
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/23/214.
Yeah
Le 24.02.2005 18:18, Greg KH a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 06:06:39PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 24.02.2005 00:47, Greg KH a ?crit :
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:36:50PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
hey, what's this /dev/hds ? digging into /sys/block...
~$ ls -l /sys/block/hds/device
lr
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 06:06:39PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>
>
> Le 24.02.2005 00:47, Greg KH a ?crit :
> >On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:36:50PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> >
> >>hey, what's this /dev/hds ? digging into /sys/block...
> >>
> >>~$ ls -l /sys/block/hds/device
> >>lrwxrwxrwx
Le 24.02.2005 00:47, Greg KH a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:36:50PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
hey, what's this /dev/hds ? digging into /sys/block...
~$ ls -l /sys/block/hds/device
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 f?v 23 22:45 /sys/block/hds/device ->
../../devices/pci:00/:00:04.1/ide1/
Le 24.02.2005 00:20, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
when trying to mount /var.
(I have two IDE disks on th
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root devic
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root devic
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:25:39 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could someone try this?
>
> Let's turn that into a real patch.
>
> --- 25/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c~ide_init_disk-fixWed Feb 23 16:24:44
> 2005
> +++ 25-akpm/driv
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:03:33AM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:41:59 -0800, Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:16:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, that worked. 2.6.11
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:41:59 -0800, Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:16:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, that worked. 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 now boots OK, but hdb1 seems to be
> > > > missing.
> >
> > Looking
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
> >>For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
> >>
> >>VFS: Cannot open root d
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
> >> For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
> >>
> >> VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or u
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:16:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, that worked. 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 now boots OK, but hdb1 seems to be
> > > missing.
>
> Looking at the IDE update in rc4-mm1:
>
> +void ide_init_disk(struct gendisk *disk, ide_drive_
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:40, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:12, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches
Dmitry Torokhov a ecrit le 24.02.2005 00:40:
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:12, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
- Various fixes and
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could someone try this?
Let's turn that into a real patch.
--- 25/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c~ide_init_disk-fixWed Feb 23 16:24:44 2005
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c Wed Feb 23 16:24:55 2005
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ide_unr
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Mathieu Segaud wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derni??rement que :
>
> > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> >> when trying to mount /var.
> >> (I ha
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, that worked. 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 now boots OK, but hdb1 seems to be
> > missing.
Looking at the IDE update in rc4-mm1:
+void ide_init_disk(struct gendisk *disk, ide_drive_t *drive)
+{
+ ide_hwif_t *hwif = drive->hwif;
+ unsigned int unit
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:36:50PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> hey, what's this /dev/hds ? digging into /sys/block...
>
> ~$ ls -l /sys/block/hds/device
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 f?v 23 22:45 /sys/block/hds/device ->
> ../../devices/pci:00/:00:04.1/ide1/1.1/
>
> /dev/hdq should be
Dominik Brodowski a écrit :
+pcmcia-bridge-resource-management-fix.patch
is responsible for this "no resource available" message, because the other
ones relate to other areas.
This line from dmesg-2.6.11-rc4 is no longer present in -rc4-mm1:
PCI: Transparent bridge - :00:1e.0
This is probably d
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:12, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> >
> > On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
> > >
> > >
> > > - Various fixes and
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que :
> Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
>> when trying to mount /var.
>> (I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.)
>> They are
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 04:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone ha
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> >> when trying to mount /var.
> >> (I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an
Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It does not seem to be finding the keyboard at all...
Can you confirm that Linus's tree is OK? You'd best use the patch
at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/testing/cset/ to make sure you
have the latest stuff.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
>
> On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
> >
> >
> > - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> > down a bit.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:36:50PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a ?crit :
> >Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> >>when trying to mount /var.
> >>(I have two IDE disks on the s
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:03:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
> > >> For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-r
Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct "root="
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:37:53AM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> I copied a working .config from an earlier kernel(-rc3), and ran make
> oldconfig, answering most of the new questions 'n'.
Then you get into trouble with stuff under CONFIG_EMBEDDED. Answering
'n' turns off stock functionality. Thoug
On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which ar
Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
when trying to mount /var.
(I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.)
They are usually hda, hdb, and hdc.
MAKEDEV h
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which are 2.6.11
> material, please tell me.
Any chance to convince the alien who took control of Jeff's libata queue to
push:
r8169: synchronization and balancing when the device is closed
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel
Dominik Brodowski a écrit :
+pcmcia-bridge-resource-management-fix.patch
is responsible for this "no resource available" message, because the other
ones relate to other areas.
Yes, good catch, reverting it makes PCMCIA work again.
Let me know if you want me to test some patches.
Thanks,
Brice
-
To
Linux 2.6 (mm tree) Compile Statistics (gcc 3.4.1)
Web page with links to complete details:
http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/
KernelbzImage bzImage bzImage modules bzImage modules
(defconfig) (allno) (allyes) (allyes) (allmod) (allmod)
---
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:42:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.11-rc3-mm1:
>...
> bk-kbuild.patch
>...
This adds -Wno-pointer-sign to the main Makefile a second time.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkne
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:20:09PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Andrew Morton a écrit :
> >ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
> I can't get PCMCIA to work anymore since rc4-mm1.
> It was working great with rc4 and rc3-mm1.
>
> PCMCIA loa
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:42:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyo
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
> >
> >
> > - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> > down a bit.
> >
>
> I am having t
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> when trying to mount /var.
> (I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.)
> They are usually hda, hdb, and hdc.
>
> MAKEDEV hdq did not help. Looking
I'm getting several modules with undefined symbols :
Kernel: arch/i386/boot/bzImage is ready
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST
*** Warning: "match_octal" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined!
*** Warning: "match_token" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined!
*** Warning: "match_int" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined!
*** Wa
Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
- Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
down a bit.
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.1
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 12:03 +0100, Mathieu Segaud wrote:
> it is the latest Robert Love posted against -mm kernels, but in
> inotify_ignore():
I posted an updated patch last Friday, which fixed this.
Anyhow, this is the correct fix.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
when trying to mount /var.
(I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.)
They are usually hda, hdb, and hdc.
MAKEDEV hdq did not help. Looking at sysfs, it turns out that
/dev/hdq1 is at major:3 minor:10
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which are 2.6.11
> material, please tell me.
I guess that depends on how you define 2.6.11 material at this point, but
I have a few patches that I wrote in there, that I think are potential
candidates due to them being fairly trivi
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que :
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has p
86 matches
Mail list logo
