Hi again Bartlomiej, all,
> > Notice how ide1, which happens to have no device attached, is listed
> > twice. I can reproduce this on my second system as well (i386 too,
> > but otherwise completely different). I guess it doesn't cause any
> > trouble, but looks suboptimal.
>
> CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 21:55:35 +0100, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bartlomiej & all,
Hi,
> > > I would tend to think that this is *not* an error, so we shouldn't
> > > display an error message in this case. Maybe init_hwif() should
> > > return 1 instead of 0 in this case.
> >
> > Ye
Hi Bartlomiej & all,
> > I would tend to think that this is *not* an error, so we shouldn't
> > display an error message in this case. Maybe init_hwif() should
> > return 1 instead of 0 in this case.
>
> Yep this is the simplest fix - interface without a drives should
> return success value. Car
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:44:22 +0100, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just gave a quick try to 2.6.11-rc3-bk1, and noticed the following
> new message in dmesg:
> ide1: failed to initialize IDE interface
>
> This seems to be new in 2.6.11-rc3-bk1. I could find the relevant
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
