On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, ext Alan Cox wrote:
> > > (from Red Hat 7) but very erratic on all 2.4-kernels I've tried it with
> > > (2.4.[012], compiled both with egcs and RH7's gcc-2.96, both share the
>
>
> > Under redhat 7 you should use kgcc to compile the kern
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
>> I've been playing around with 8-way IBM8500R (8x700MHz Xeon) with 4.5GB
>> memory & AIC7xxx SCSI-controller. It's perfectly stable with 2.2-kernel
>> (from Red Hat 7) but very erratic on all 2.4-kernels I've tried it with
>> (2.4.[012], compiled bot
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:04:09PM -0800, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Matilainen Panu (NRC/Helsinki) wrote:
>
> > I've been playing around with 8-way IBM8500R (8x700MHz Xeon) with 4.5GB
> > memory & AIC7xxx SCSI-controller. It's perfectly stable with 2.2-kernel
> > (from Red Ha
Just FYI,
I am chasing this problem. There appears to be an unpleasant interaction between
the Advanced Systems Management card and the NMI watchdog code. Ripping the card
out of the machine also eradicates the problem, but is less desirable.
I'll let people know when there's a better solution.
"Dr. Kelsey Hudson" wrote:
> Under redhat 7 you should use kgcc to compile the kernel, since gcc2.96 is
> inherently broken(*).
Or upgrade to the current Red Hat 7 gcc, which works quite well.
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
> > (from Red Hat 7) but very erratic on all 2.4-kernels I've tried it with
> > (2.4.[012], compiled both with egcs and RH7's gcc-2.96, both share the
> Under redhat 7 you should use kgcc to compile the kernel, since gcc2.96 is
So he was using egcs, and wh
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Matilainen Panu (NRC/Helsinki) wrote:
> I've been playing around with 8-way IBM8500R (8x700MHz Xeon) with 4.5GB
> memory & AIC7xxx SCSI-controller. It's perfectly stable with 2.2-kernel
> (from Red Hat 7) but very erratic on all 2.4-kernels I've tried it with
> (2.4.[012], com
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, ext Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Matilainen Panu (NRC/Helsinki)" wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, ext Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > Is it stable with `nmi_watchdog=0'?
> >
> > If the default value for nmi_watchdog is 0 then no - I added the
> > nmi_watchdog=1 just to see if that ma
8 matches
Mail list logo