Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7 shutdowns and eepro100 woes

2000-12-20 Thread Dragan Stancevic
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000, Andrey Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ; To answer your question in short, yet, we hope to fix the problem sooner or ; later. I added the print out of the message to see in what state was the card being left after it was wedged. The card seems to be locking up with un

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7 shutdowns and eepro100 woes

2000-12-11 Thread Andrey Savochkin
Hello, On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:52:19AM -0800, Tom Murphy wrote: >Also, regarding the eepro100 driver, are there any plans to fix > support for the following chipset (given by lspci): > [snip] > I have one of these at work and I will get the following messages: > > Dec 11 10:46:13 morph

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7 [ymfpci doesn't survive suspend to disk]

2000-12-08 Thread Alan Cox
> However when I then suspended the machine and resumed it sound no longer > worked. In fact the mpg123 that I used to test it after the resume is > now just sitting there. The driver does not currently support power management. In fact whoever hacked on the include files went and put __init in

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7 [ymfpci doesn't survive suspend to disk]

2000-12-08 Thread Simon Huggins
Hi, On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:29:14PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > - test7: > - Kai Germaschewski: ymfpci cleanups and resource leak fixes > - pre5: > - Jaroslav Kysela: ymfpci driver Just tried this out on my laptop and it played and didn't give strange messages that Pete's driver

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7

2000-12-07 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > Maybe I'm stating something which is obvious to everybody, but note > that pci_assign_unassigned_resources is only called from Possibly, but I don't know either. :) > ./arch/alpha/kernel/pci.c: pci_assign_unassigned_resources

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7

2000-12-07 Thread Miles Lane
Linus Torvalds wrote: > probably vote for getting rid of the device enables in > pci_assign_unassigned_resources() (for all the reasons already mentioned > by others - scribbling over memory due to not being quiescent etc). But > it's not worth breaking now. 2.5.x material. Most PCI drivers may a

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7

2000-12-07 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Russell King wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > - me: UHCI drivers really need to enable bus mastering. > > But it'll already be turned on if pci_assign_unassigned_resources() is > called. This calls pdev_enable_device for every single device, which > turns on the bus

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7

2000-12-07 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Russell King wrote: > > Is it intentional that pci_assign_unassigned_resources should: > 1. enable all devices? > 2. enable bus master on all devices? Probably intentional, but probably for all the wrong reasons. The device enabling is still required for all drivers that a

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre7

2000-12-07 Thread Russell King
Linus Torvalds writes: > - me: UHCI drivers really need to enable bus mastering. But it'll already be turned on if pci_assign_unassigned_resources() is called. This calls pdev_enable_device for every single device, which turns on the bus master bit in the PCI command register. Is it intenti