On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Now, will the two people in the world who know the pirq black magic now
> stand up and confirm or deride my interpretation?
since I'm certainly not the other one, I'm not going to confirm it ;-)
But, besides it sounds reasonable, I could give some mor
> Despite the latest ACPI update, I still get the ACPI slowdown on
> initialisation which started with the -pre10 changes. Also, the uhci
> module doesn't work for me (the latest patch from Johannes
> Erdfelt does
> work). This is an Abit KA7-100, which has the KX133 chipset. Here is
> the dme
> The other changes in pre12 aren't likely to be all that noticeable, unless
> you happen to be hit by just that detail.. As always, fedback is
> appreciated.
>
> Linus
>
>
>
> pre12:
> - Get non-cpuid Cyrix probing right (it's not a NexGen)
> - Jens Axboe: cdrom tray statu
| > Problem still exists, diffed to last kernel:
| Yes. But everything works for you, no? Including USB?
Mmmhmm..
| The problem is that you have this routing table entry:
|
| 00:01 slot=00 0:62/1eb8 1:00/ 2:00/ 3:00/
|
| which is really for the USB chip (PCI id 00:01.2), and which th
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Aaron Tiensivu wrote:
>
> Problem still exists, diffed to last kernel:
Yes. But everything works for you, no? Including USB?
The problem is that you have this routing table entry:
00:01 slot=00 0:62/1eb8 1:00/ 2:00/ 3:00/
which is really for the USB
| Could people that had problems with SiS interrupt handling before please
| give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
| of pirq tables from people, and Martin Diehl put them together with the
| hardware specs to come up with what looks to be the "final and correct
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
[...]
> The other changes in pre12 aren't likely to be all that noticeable, unless
[...]
> Linus
Seems that even you are still confused with -testXX and -preXX ;)
7 matches
Mail list logo
