Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-14 Thread Paweł Kot
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Andrew Morton wrote: > Oh no. Another one. Could you please try this attached > patch (against test11-pre2) and see if the diagnostics > come out? There's an oops in the attachment. I haven't try your latest patch yet. But I'm applying it at the moment. pkot -- mailto:[E

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Jasper Spaans wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 01:27:13PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > > > >That's a pretty wierd trace. You seem to have addresses related > > >to the `apm' kernel thread on mysqld's stack. > > > > Normal unfortunately. Firstly the ix86 oops code just scans the stack > > and

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Keith Owens wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:58:17 +0100, > Jasper Spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >All right, here's another one, this time using the oops directly from the > >console -- this seems to give better symbols.. The 'console shuts up ...' > >works, the oops from the other CPU did

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-13 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:58:17 +0100, Jasper Spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >All right, here's another one, this time using the oops directly from the >console -- this seems to give better symbols.. The 'console shuts up ...' >works, the oops from the other CPU didn't get put out. O, damn!

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-13 Thread Jasper Spaans
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 01:27:13PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > >That's a pretty wierd trace. You seem to have addresses related > >to the `apm' kernel thread on mysqld's stack. > > Normal unfortunately. Firstly the ix86 oops code just scans the stack > and prints anything that looks like it mi

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-11 Thread Keith Owens
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 12:32:55 +1100, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: >That's a pretty wierd trace. You seem to have addresses related >to the `apm' kernel thread on mysqld's stack. Normal unfortunately. Firstly the ix86 oops code

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Jasper Spaans wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:25:00AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: > > > Oh no. Another one. Could you please try this attached > > patch (against test11-pre2) and see if the diagnostics > > come out? > > And yet a

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-11 Thread Jasper Spaans
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:25:00AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > > NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: > Oh no. Another one. Could you please try this attached > patch (against test11-pre2) and see if the diagnostics > come out? And yet another one... I applied your patch, and ra

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-10 Thread Andrew Morton
"Pawe³ Kot" wrote: > > Hello, > > I've following error with 2.4.0-test{9|10|pre11pre1-ac1|pre11pre2-ac1}: > > NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: > > And then the machine hangs. No response at all. > Always CPU3 is mentioned. > The machine is: > The latest Intel motherboard for 4x

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-10 Thread Paweł Kot
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, [iso-8859-2] Paweł Kot wrote: > > > NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: > > > What can be wrong? > > You forgot to read the REPORTING-BUGS file. > > You told us everything except the really > important information ... the backtrace from > the info printed by th

Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

2000-11-10 Thread Rik van Riel
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, [iso-8859-2] Pawe³ Kot wrote: > NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers: > What can be wrong? You forgot to read the REPORTING-BUGS file. You told us everything except the really important information ... the backtrace from the info printed by the NMI Oopser... re