Re: 2.4.0-test10 oops

2000-11-11 Thread Ben Chu
Jan Dvorak said: > > Hi, > > attached oops came from writing to vfat fs. This problem was brought up a couple of times before as referenced here http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0010.3/0652.html http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0006.1/1754.html http://www.uws

Re: 2.4.0-test10 Oops

2000-11-08 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:00:50PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > >>EIP; c68385ab <[3c509].text.start+54b/6e8> <= > Trace; 0499 > Trace; c683935b <[3c509]init_module+57/74> [...] > 3c509 7408 1 (initializing) I think this is a known problem and has been fixed

Re: 2.4.0-test10 Oops

2000-11-07 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 02:19:05PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:03:44 +0100, > Frank van Maarseveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >First a firewall is installed (ppp0). Starting the network (eth0/lo only. ppp0 is > >nonexistent at this point) gives the following Oops: > > klo

Re: 2.4.0-test10 Oops

2000-11-06 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:03:44 +0100, Frank van Maarseveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >First a firewall is installed (ppp0). Starting the network (eth0/lo only. ppp0 is >nonexistent at this point) gives the following Oops: >Nov 6 22:20:25 iapetus kernel: EIP: >0010:[ipt_REJECT:__insmod_ipt_REJE