On 2 Jan 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Gregory McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
> > 0
>
> That's your problem. Your limit for overall shm pages is zero. So you
> cannot allocate any shm segments.
>
> echo 200 > /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
>
> and check /etc/sy
OK, mystery (partially) solved. I have the Gnome CD Player applet running in my
panel. (Yeah, I know, if I'm running Gnome, I deserve whatever I get. :-)
Anyway, the CD player can be added to the panel in two forms: a launcher that
just launches the application window, and an applet that has
Allan,
my graphic card is a matrox 1- video card is a haupauge/model618pci , no AGP
or DRM. The output of ver_linux + lsmod below. There has to be significant
change from test13pre7 to prerelease ff. There is an immediate standstill,
nothing in /var/log/messages or /var/log/warn.
kind regards
> I've tested 2.4.0prerelease pure - ac1-ac2-ac3-ac4-ac5 and my system crashed
> whenever I left X.
> Having switched back to 2.4.0-test13pre7 all is fine.
> I'm no developer, so if you need more information, give me some hints.
What video card do you have and are you using AGP or DRM (an lsmo
Look at include/linux/smp.h: on SMP, it includes , on UP it
contains a
#define smp_num_cpus1
I assume that someone directly includes .
Try to add a
#ifndef __LINUX_SMP_H
#error Found it!
#endif
to the beginning of
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 23:51:31 -0500,
Frank Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
> I received the following make dep error while compiling
>prerelease-ac5 .
>make -C acpi fastdep
>make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/acpi'
>/usr/src/linux/Rules.make:224: *** Recursive variab
Gregory McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
> 0
That's your problem. Your limit for overall shm pages is zero. So you
cannot allocate any shm segments.
echo 200 > /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
and check /etc/sysctl.conf or wherever your system stores kernel
parameters
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 04:20:16PM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Vedran Rodic wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:38:07PM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > Could you provide details of your configuration?
> >
> > I put the complete kernel log of that session at
>http://quark.fsb.hr/~vrodic
Vedran Rodic wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:38:07PM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Could you provide details of your configuration?
>
> I put the complete kernel log of that session at http://quark.fsb.hr/~vrodic/kern.log
>
> I scanned my swap device several times today with badblocks -w
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:38:07PM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Could you provide details of your configuration?
>
I put the complete kernel log of that session at http://quark.fsb.hr/~vrodic/kern.log
I scanned my swap device several times today with badblocks -w, and
it didn't show any erro
Could you provide details of your configuration?
Vedran Rodic wrote:
> I was using 2.4.0-prerelease without extra patches and I experienced some
> heavy (ext2) file system corruption. I was grabbing some video using bttv at
> the time. Kernel didn't oops, but processess just started terminating.
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Just installed 2.4.0-prerelease, and it looks like FAT
> > filesystems on hardware 2048-byte sectors are still not
> > working.
> > Are there any plans to fix this, or should I consider
>
> Jens was fixing it for CD-ROM devices. I dont know if anyone was
Hi Jean-Luc,
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, f5ibh wrote:
> You wrote :
> > Is the "previous test version" you talk about 2.4.0-test13-pre7? There
> > weren't any changes since then that could explain this, except maybe:
> Yes, I mean test13-pre[12134567] and other older versions too.
> I've already had the
Hi Hans,
You wrote :
> Is the "previous test version" you talk about 2.4.0-test13-pre7? There
> weren't any changes since then that could explain this, except maybe:
Yes, I mean test13-pre[12134567] and other older versions too.
I've already had the problem some time ago with an older 2.4.0-tes
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Gregory McLean wrote:
>
> Hi, I just compiled and booted up 2.4.0-prerelease, dropped into X-Windows
> and now gtk/gnome apps are giving the following warning:
>
> Gdk-WARNING **: shmget failed!
>
> Any ideas on what changed in the shm space to cause this?
>
> This is a PII 33
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, f5ibh wrote:
> I've just compiled and tested 2.4.0-prerelease. My AX25 (hamradio) system does
> not work with this new release. There is a timing problem. When a fram is sent
> on the air, the frame is VERY long (switched off by the watchdog of my drsi
> card) and contains no d
:-> "Hans" == Hans Grobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff -u4Nr -X dontdiff linux-2.4.0-prerelease.orig/drivers/net/setup.c
linux-2.4.0-prerelease/drivers/net/setup.c
> --- linux-2.4.0-prerelease.orig/drivers/net/setup.c Mon Dec 11 21:38:29
2000
> +++ linux-2.4.0-prerele
On 1 Jan 2001, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> Hi there... first compilation error of 2001 (at least in my timezone :-)
>
> ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext
>arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \
> --start-group \
>
> Just installed 2.4.0-prerelease, and it looks like FAT
> filesystems on hardware 2048-byte sectors are still not
> working.
> Are there any plans to fix this, or should I consider
Jens was fixing it for CD-ROM devices. I dont know if anyone was fixing
for M/O devices currently
> such devices o
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:38:16PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> Of course, adding
>
> #include
>
> to drivers/char/drm/drmP.h makes it all work
Right, but that _shouldn't_ be needed. iirc, modversions.h should be included
when needed, so this is covering up the bug not fixing it.
--
Tom Rini
20 matches
Mail list logo
