Hi!
> So...I'm bummed. I'm assuming a 30% degradation in an app is probably
> not expected behavior? Swap usage is '0' in both OS's (i.e. it's not
> a run out of memory issue).
Vmware is _not_ application, it is dirty kernel hack. Do it without
vmware.
LA Walsh wrote:
[snip]
> So the kapm thing could be a "display" / accounting problem, but the
> slowdown in vmware/X was real. I ran a WIN Norton "Benchmark" -- comes
> up reliably over "300" -- usually around 320-350 under 2.2.17. Under
> 2.4, it came up reliably *under* 300 with typical being
2 matches
Mail list logo
