On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 09:54:33AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > So I would think that this block of new major number allocations holds for
> > 2.5 and not 2.4. Also, if I'm correct, 2.4 won't be needing a lot of new
> > major numbers anyhow.
>
> I wouldnt bet on that. Going to a 32bit dev_t interna
> So I would think that this block of new major number allocations holds for
> 2.5 and not 2.4. Also, if I'm correct, 2.4 won't be needing a lot of new
> major numbers anyhow.
I wouldnt bet on that. Going to a 32bit dev_t internally without user space
noticing would keep it seems to be quite doab
2 matches
Mail list logo
