Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 08000060

2013-10-07 Thread Fengguang Wu
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:36:17AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:17:20PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:49:57AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > The numbers in the below two lines mean > > > > > > git bisect good c31eeaced22ce8bd61268a3c595d54

Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 08000060

2013-10-07 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:17:20PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:49:57AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > The numbers in the below two lines mean > > > > git bisect good c31eeaced22ce8bd61268a3c595d542bb38c0a4f # 21:59450+ > > > Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/lin

Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 08000060

2013-10-07 Thread Fengguang Wu
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:49:57AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:47:28AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > Here is another bisect on a different kconfig. > > > > [6.612196] Write protecting the kernel text: 9752k > > [6.613078] Write protect

Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 08000060

2013-10-07 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:47:28AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > Here is another bisect on a different kconfig. > > [6.612196] Write protecting the kernel text: 9752k > [6.613078] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 3444k > [6.647222] BUG: unable to handle kern

Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 08000060

2013-10-06 Thread Fengguang Wu
Hi Mike, On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:27:41AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 07:47 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > Here is another bisect on a different kconfig. > > No explosions here, it gives my compiler a terminal tummy ache. Thanks for looking into thi

Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 08000060

2013-10-06 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 07:47 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Here is another bisect on a different kconfig. No explosions here, it gives my compiler a terminal tummy ache. marge:/usr/local/src/kernel/linux-3.x-tip # make net/sunrpc/xprtsock.o make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. mak