Re: [uml-devel] leak in do_ubd_request

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:37:53AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > Do we have any idea which patch this patch fixes? > > I seems like a mainline bug, and has been present for some time > (forever?). > > I have no idea why this wasn't noticed earlier. Not forever, but it's been there for a while

Re: [uml-devel] leak in do_ubd_request

> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:20:20 -0500 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:29:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > Sure. The patch works for me, but please check that it also makes > > > sense. > > > > I did - it's a straight-forward leak and fix. > > > > Do

Re: [uml-devel] leak in do_ubd_request

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:20:20 -0500 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:29:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > Sure. The patch works for me, but please check that it also makes > > sense. > > I did - it's a straight-forward leak and fix. > Do we have any idea whi

Re: [uml-devel] leak in do_ubd_request

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:29:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Sure. The patch works for me, but please check that it also makes > sense. I did - it's a straight-forward leak and fix. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - To unsubscribe from

Re: [uml-devel] leak in do_ubd_request

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 07:26:38PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > + kfree(io_req); > > Whoops, nice catch. > > Can you sign that off for me? Sure. The patch works for me, but please check that it also makes sense. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [uml-devel] leak in do_ubd_request

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 07:26:38PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > + kfree(io_req); Whoops, nice catch. Can you sign that off for me? Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line