On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Convert one loop to NR_CPUS to use the cpu_possible map instead.
> >
>
> I'm just wondering how broken this is. Is there any assumption that
> there is no holes in the online cpu map in this code ?
Yeah, I saw only one loop in there and so I thi
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I would suggest to separate that one and fast-track it, possibly even for
> 2.6.24
I already did. Andrew has the patch in his tree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 02:11:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ACPI uses NR_CPUS in various loops and in some it accesses per cpu
> data of processors that are not present(!) and that will never be present.
> The pointers to per cpu data are typically not initialized for processors
> that are not
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ACPI uses NR_CPUS in various loops and in some it accesses per cpu
> data of processors that are not present(!) and that will never be present.
> The pointers to per cpu data are typically not initialized for processors
> that are not present. So we
4 matches
Mail list logo
