Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 7:08 PM, Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could you submit the XML files and the autogeneration code? The C file > > isn't really source. Not only is it big, it'll probably change around a > > whole lot when you make small

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Jan 28, 2008 7:08 PM, Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2008 8:04 AM, richard kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > there is a lot of duplication in your file, but you could slim it down a > > > bit if thats the only objecti

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 8:04 AM, richard kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:40 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > >>> the trouble is that

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Jan 28, 2008 8:04 AM, richard kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:40 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> the trouble is that this file currently weighs in at ~1.8 megs. this > >>

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread richard kennedy
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 5:40 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> the trouble is that this file currently weighs in at ~1.8 megs. this >>> is because it contains all the information for all Blackfin processors >>> w

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Jan 28, 2008 5:40 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the trouble is that this file currently weighs in at ~1.8 megs. this > > is because it contains all the information for all Blackfin processors > > we support (which currentl

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Bryan Wu
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > we have guys who maintain xml descriptions of all Blackfin processors. > these include an exhaustive list of all the peripherals and their > MMRs. for example, there is an element that binds the address, the > MMR name (as described in t

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Jan 28, 2008 5:16 AM, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the trouble is that this file currently weighs in at ~1.8 megs. this > is because it contains all the information for all Blackfin processors > we support (which currently, is about ~23 variants). it's only going > to get bigger