On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 01-08-19 20:12:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Thu 01-08-19 03:01:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
> > > > readily available, it makes
On Thu 01-08-19 20:12:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 01-08-19 03:01:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
> > > readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines
>
On Thu 01-08-19 13:28:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 03:01:32AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > @@ -1931,7 +1932,7 @@ static void __jbd2_journal_temp_unlink_b
> > transaction_t *transaction;
> > struct buffer_head *bh = jh2bh(jh);
> >
> > - J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jbd_
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 01-08-19 03:01:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
> > readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines
> > and write out spin_*lock() at all call sites.
> >
>
>
On Thu 01-08-19 03:01:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Bit-spinlocks are problematic on PREEMPT_RT if functions which might sleep
> on RT, e.g. spin_lock(), alloc/free(), are invoked inside the lock held
> region because bit spinlocks disable preemption even on RT.
>
> A first attempt was to replace s
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 03:01:32AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -1931,7 +1932,7 @@ static void __jbd2_journal_temp_unlink_b
> transaction_t *transaction;
> struct buffer_head *bh = jh2bh(jh);
>
> - J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jbd_is_locked_bh_state(bh));
> + assert_spin_locked(&jh-
6 matches
Mail list logo