Re: [patch 29/32] genirq: Remove irq_reserve_irq[s]

2014-05-08 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, 07 May 2014 15:44:21 -, Thomas Gleixner > wrote: > > No more users. And it's not going to come back. If you need > > hotplugable irq chips, use irq domains. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > > Acked-by: Grant Likely > > The ironic

Re: [patch 29/32] genirq: Remove irq_reserve_irq[s]

2014-05-08 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, 07 May 2014 15:44:21 -, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > No more users. And it's not going to come back. If you need > hotplugable irq chips, use irq domains. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Grant Likely The ironic thing is that irq_domain may end up bringing this function ba