On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > Another way to address that rm9200 issue would be to just rate
> > the TC clockevent source lower than the one based on the system
> > timer, so it's set up but never enabled ... and remember "t2_clk",
> > calling clk_enable() only when tha
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:51:16 -0800
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > +static cycle_t tc_get_cycles(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > > > + u32 lower, upper;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> > > >
> > > > Why do
> > > > +static cycle_t tc_get_cycles(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > > + u32 lower, upper;
> > > > +
> > > > + raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> > >
> > > Why do you need to use the raw version?
> >
> > This is part of the system timer code, and it
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:42:51 -0800
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:28:37 -0800
> > David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > +static cycle_t tc_get_cycles(void)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > + u32 lower, upper;
> > > +
> >
> Again, sorry for the delay...it really sucks that I haven't been able
> to look at this stuff closely until now. Hopefully a late review is
> better than no review.
Yes. The review I've gotten so far has been of the "it works for me,
thanks" variety.
(The only issue reported to me is that NO_H
Again, sorry for the delay...it really sucks that I haven't been able
to look at this stuff closely until now. Hopefully a late review is
better than no review.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:28:37 -0800
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +static cycle_t tc_get_cycles(void)
> +{
> + unsigned
6 matches
Mail list logo
