Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc2] gpio_direction_output() needs an initial value

2007-03-02 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 01 March 2007 9:48 pm, Andrew Victor wrote: > hi David, > > > It's been pointed out that output GPIOs should have an initial value, to > > avoid signal glitching ... among other things, it can be some time before > > a driver is ready. This patch corrects that oversight, fixing > > F

Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc2] gpio_direction_output() needs an initial value

2007-03-02 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:25:09 -0800 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's been pointed out that output GPIOs should have an initial value, to > avoid signal glitching ... among other things, it can be some time before > a driver is ready. This patch corrects that oversight, fixing > >

Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc2] gpio_direction_output() needs an initial value

2007-03-01 Thread Milan Svoboda
> It's been pointed out that output GPIOs should have an initial value, to > avoid signal glitching ... among other things, it can be some time before > a driver is ready. This patch corrects that oversight, fixing > > - documentation > - platforms supporting the GPIO interface > - users of t

Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc2] gpio_direction_output() needs an initial value

2007-03-01 Thread Andrew Victor
hi David, > It's been pointed out that output GPIOs should have an initial value, to > avoid signal glitching ... among other things, it can be some time before > a driver is ready. This patch corrects that oversight, fixing For the AT91 changes: Acked-by: Andrew Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >