Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
>
> > OK, maybe I was too fast in concluding with that change. I'm
> > still trying to find out why is MM working bad in some
> > circumstances (see my other email to the list).
> >
> > Anyway, I would than suggest
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
>
> > The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the
> > mm & proc code.
> >
> > Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
> >
> > if ((rw == WRITE) && atomic_read(&nr_async_pages) >
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> Anyway, I would than suggest to introduce another /proc entry and call
> it appropriately: max_async_pages. Because that is what we care about,
> anyway. I'll send another patch.
Anton Blanchard already did a patch for this. Sent to the list
on Thu, 7 Dec 2
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> OK, maybe I was too fast in concluding with that change. I'm
> still trying to find out why is MM working bad in some
> circumstances (see my other email to the list).
>
> Anyway, I would than suggest to introduce another /proc entry
> and call it appropria
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the
> mm & proc code.
>
> Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
>
> if ((rw == WRITE) && atomic_read(&nr_async_pages) >
>pager_daemon.swap_cluster * (1 <
Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
>
> > The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the mm &
> > proc code.
> >
> > Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
> >
> > if ((rw == WRITE) && atomic_read(&nr_async_pages
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the mm &
> proc code.
>
> Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
>
> if ((rw == WRITE) && atomic_read(&nr_async_pages) >
>pager_daemon.swap_cluster * (1
7 matches
Mail list logo