Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tony, Len the way pci_disable_device is being used in a suspend/resume
>> path by a few drivers is completely incompatible with the way irqs are
>> allocated on ia64. In particular people the following sequence occurs
>> in several drivers.
>>
>> probe
> Tony, Len the way pci_disable_device is being used in a suspend/resume
> path by a few drivers is completely incompatible with the way irqs are
> allocated on ia64. In particular people the following sequence occurs
> in several drivers.
>
> probe:
> pci_enable_device(pdev);
> request_ir
* Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Eric's patch seems to have done the trick on my T60: i've done 10
> > suspend+resumes and each worked fine. I've tidied up the description
> > part of Eric's patch a bit for upstream application - find it below.
>
> Thanks. Tidying up the des
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [...] I'll now re-test Eric's MSI patch.
>
> Eric's patch seems to have done the trick on my T60: i've done 10
> suspend+resumes and each worked fine. I've tidied up the description
> part of Eric's patch a b
4 matches
Mail list logo