Quoting Frans Klaver :
On 29 June 2017 01:57:19 CEST, "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
wrote:
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -637,9 +637,10 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime
*curr,
*= (rtime_i+1 - rtime_i) + utime_i
*
On 29 June 2017 01:57:19 CEST, "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
wrote:
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -637,9 +637,10 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime
>*curr,
*= (rtime_i+1 - rtime_i) + utime_i
*
Hi Frans,
Quoting Frans Klaver :
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Frans Klaver wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
Hello everybody,
While looking into Coverity ID 1371643 I ran into the following piece of
code at kernel/sched/cputime.c:568:
568/*
569 * Adju
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Frans Klaver wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> While looking into Coverity ID 1371643 I ran into the following piece of
>> code at kernel/sched/cputime.c:568:
>>
>> 568/*
>> 569 * Adjust tick based
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> While looking into Coverity ID 1371643 I ran into the following piece of
> code at kernel/sched/cputime.c:568:
>
> 568/*
> 569 * Adjust tick based cputime random precision against scheduler runtime
> 570 * account
5 matches
Mail list logo