On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:34 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> This time around, the powerpc merges are going to be a little bit
> more complicated than usual.
Looks like I sent this one twice, one with "merge" and one with "next"
in the subject. They are otherwise identical (i
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 15:05 +0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > My original intend was to put it in powerpc-next and then shoot it to
> > stable, but it got a tad annoying (due to churn it needs to be applied
> > at least on rc4
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> My original intend was to put it in powerpc-next and then shoot it to
> stable, but it got a tad annoying (due to churn it needs to be applied
> at least on rc4 or later while my next is at rc1 and clean that way), so
> I put it i
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:58 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > Here are a handful of powerpc fixes for 3.13.
>
> Grr.
>
> I've pulled it, but looking at that history, it's just pure and utter
> f*cking garbage.
>
> It was rebas
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Here are a handful of powerpc fixes for 3.13.
Grr.
I've pulled it, but looking at that history, it's just pure and utter
f*cking garbage.
It was rebased *minutes* before sending it, as far as I can tell. Why?
And it has a pointl
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>
> So, we now use the original date header (if present) in the mbox views:
>
> $ wget -qO - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/249598/mbox/ | grep ^Date
> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:42:54 +1000
>
> ... for all your data-mining needs.
Goodie, and I
Hi Linus,
> No. The date from the email was
>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:42:54 +1000
>
> and we want *that* date.
Ah, gotchya.
So, we now use the original date header (if present) in the mbox views:
$ wget -qO - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/249598/mbox/ | grep ^Date
Date: Fri, 7 Jun
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> .. the rationale for this is that the work pattern of people is
> actually interesting information. You can do things like this:
>
> git log --pretty=%aD --author=Torvalds
Final side note: for me, and other git users that apply other p
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> And it does matter.
.. the rationale for this is that the work pattern of people is
actually interesting information. You can do things like this:
git log --pretty=%aD --author=Torvalds
to see what my work pattern is, and I think tha
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>
> We keep all patch dates in UTC, but were generating the Date header
> incorrectly. Now fixed:
No, not fixed.
Keeping patch dates in UTC *corrupts* the date.
I'll ask people to stop using patchworks if it cannot keep track of
emailed dates.
Hi Linus,
> Is Jeremy the patchwork maintainer?
Yep, that's me.
> and it turns out that apparently 'patchwork' is just making up random
> times, because when you download the email as an mbox, it will turn
> this into that corrupt and incorrect
>
> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:42:54 -
>
>
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 14:33 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > Here are a few more powerpc changes for 3.10. I've merged your
> > tree in at some point (which I generally avoid) in order to get
> > the compat network fixes as soo
[ Is Jeremy the patchwork maintainer? If not, can people forward this
to the real maintainer? ]
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> This is not just bugfixes. In fact, as far as I can tell, this
> *introduces* bugs, with that "get_user()" in the exception path that
> can app
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Here are a few more powerpc changes for 3.10. I've merged your
> tree in at some point (which I generally avoid) in order to get
> the compat network fixes as soon as possible.
>
> Mostly regressions, and stuff I judged could/shoul
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 09:22 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here are a few more fixes for powerpc 3.10. It's a bit more than I would
> have liked this late in the game but I suppose that's what happens with
> a brand new chip generation coming out.
>
> A few regression fixes,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 16:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> I'll have you know that I haven't quite even left for Au yet, and I
>> have LCA before diving. So no snarky "in between dives" comments,
>> please.
>
> It wasn't meant to be
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 16:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'll have you know that I haven't quite even left for Au yet, and I
> have LCA before diving. So no snarky "in between dives" comments,
> please.
It wasn't meant to be "snarky", sorry about that...
> At least not for a few days.
>
> >
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Whenever you have a chance between two dives, you might want to consider
> pulling my merge branch to pickup a few fixes for 3.8 that have been
> accumulating for the last couple of weeks (I was myself travelling
> then on vacation
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 17:13 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here are a couple of small powerpc fixes. They aren't new bugs (and
> they are both CCed to stable) but I didn't see the point of sitting
> on the fixes any longer.
Looks like I still need to fix my script to get th
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:07 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here's a patch that would be good to still have in 3.7. It's a one liner
> fixing
> a regression introduced by the new EEH code in .37 (potential oops on some
> PCI setups when configuring MSIs).
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:08 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:07 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Hi Linus !
> >
> > Here's a patch that would be good to still have in 3.7. It's a one liner
> > fixing
> > a regression introduced by the new EEH code in .37 (po
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 09:02 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. There's nothing there.
>
> Did you mean for me to pull some branch/tag you didn't mention?
Heh, yeah, the mirrors hadn't updated yet so git request-pull didn't put
the branch name in. It's common but I usually fix it up by hand. Sinc
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So this happens if you have "reverse merges" (ie you've pulled my
> tree, or some other tree I've pulled), and there is no longer a single
> clear common point that you started from. In that case, there is no
> simple diff for the "what has
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> The following changes since commit 271fd03a3013b106ccc178d54219c1be0c9759b7:
>
> powerpc/powernv: I/O and memory alignment for P2P bridges (2012-09-11
> 16:59:47 -0600)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> First, however, a note about the pull request details ... the diffstat looks
> completely on crack, any idea what's up ? It sees piles of files modified
> in various other archs & generic code but I see no patch in that branch
> tha
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 16:12 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The following changes since commit
> 5b716ac728bcc01b1f2a7ed6e437196602237c27:
>
> Merge branch 'for-next' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6
> (2012-09-02 11:30:10 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
