On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 03:07:07PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Seth Forshee
> wrote:
>
> > I haven't seen anything to indicate that this filesystem will be broken
> > by this, just that it's broken by untranslated pids. Presumably it would
> > just reject any r
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Seth Forshee
wrote:
> I haven't seen anything to indicate that this filesystem will be broken
> by this, just that it's broken by untranslated pids. Presumably it would
> just reject any requests which aren't representable in its namespace.
Without failing the op
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:31:40PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Seth Forshee writes:
>
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:21:38PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:59:32PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:44:35PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wro
Seth Forshee writes:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:21:38PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:59:32PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:44:35PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > > Seth Forshee writes:
>> > >
>> > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 04:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:21:38PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:59:32PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:44:35PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Seth Forshee writes:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 04:23:55PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:59:32PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:44:35PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Seth Forshee writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 04:23:55PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > >> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:56 PM, wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > 3
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:44:35PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Seth Forshee writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 04:23:55PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:56 PM, wrote:
> >> >
> >> > 3.10.0-229 form Scientific Linux and native 4.0.1-1 (from elrepo).
> >> > SL
Seth Forshee writes:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 04:23:55PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:56 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> > 3.10.0-229 form Scientific Linux and native 4.0.1-1 (from elrepo).
>> > SL 7.1 on the host and SL 6.6 on the LXC guest. At least in 3.10
>> > the 499dcf2024
Miklos Szeredi writes:
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:56 PM, wrote:
>>
>> 3.10.0-229 form Scientific Linux and native 4.0.1-1 (from elrepo).
>> SL 7.1 on the host and SL 6.6 on the LXC guest. At least in 3.10
>> the 499dcf2024092e5cce41d05599a5b51d1f92031a is present.
>> Steps to reproduce:
>>
>> O
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 04:23:55PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:56 PM, wrote:
> >
> > 3.10.0-229 form Scientific Linux and native 4.0.1-1 (from elrepo).
> > SL 7.1 on the host and SL 6.6 on the LXC guest. At least in 3.10
> > the 499dcf2024092e5cce41d05599a5b51d1f92031a
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:56 PM, wrote:
>
> 3.10.0-229 form Scientific Linux and native 4.0.1-1 (from elrepo).
> SL 7.1 on the host and SL 6.6 on the LXC guest. At least in 3.10
> the 499dcf2024092e5cce41d05599a5b51d1f92031a is present.
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> On first console:
> [root@sl7test ~
11 matches
Mail list logo