On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:48:22AM -0800, Kevin Strasser wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 06:14:58PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:35:07AM -0800, Kevin Strasser wrote:
> > > All sst firmware is provided under the intel directory of the
> > > linux-firmware
> > > tree. By
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:48:22AM -0800, Kevin Strasser wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 06:14:58PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Applied, thanks. It doesn't apply as a fix but that seems to be OK as the
> > only request_firmware() I spotted there appears to use intel/ prefixed
> > directories al
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 06:14:58PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:35:07AM -0800, Kevin Strasser wrote:
> > All sst firmware is provided under the intel directory of the linux-firmware
> > tree. By default this directory structure is kept when installing on a
> > target system
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:48:52PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:56:06 +,
> > You just broken existing systems. I agree entirely with your change - but
> > you need to search both paths for now and maybe in a few years time remove
> > the old path.
> IMO, it's fine in thi
At Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:56:06 +,
One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:35:07 -0800
> Kevin Strasser wrote:
>
> > All sst firmware is provided under the intel directory of the linux-firmware
> > tree. By default this directory structure is kept when installing on a
> > target
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
