On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Russell, please undo this patch. isa_virt_to_bus() is not dependent on
> > > > CONFIG_ISA. It causes problems on x86_64 platforms which cannot enable
> > > > ISA support.
> >
> > Actually it is, x86_64 just refuses to set
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:08:32PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
For i386 and x86_64 it's defined as virt_to_phys in asm/io.h without any
#ifdef:s protecting it.
Not all the world is a PC
Then the dependency should in that case be on architectures. It is
connecte
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:08:32PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> For i386 and x86_64 it's defined as virt_to_phys in asm/io.h without any
> #ifdef:s protecting it.
Not all the world is a PC
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMA
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:31:16PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
The problem was that the DMA API didn't work for x86_64 when I wrote the
driver. I see now that it has been fixed.
isa_virt_to_bus still works even though CONFIG_ISA is not configured. So
It may not ex
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:31:16PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> The problem was that the DMA API didn't work for x86_64 when I wrote the
> driver. I see now that it has been fixed.
> isa_virt_to_bus still works even though CONFIG_ISA is not configured. So
It may not exist at all.
-
To unsubscr
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Russell, please undo this patch. isa_virt_to_bus() is not dependent on
CONFIG_ISA. It causes problems on x86_64 platforms which cannot enable
ISA support.
Actually it is, x86_64 just refuses to set CONFIG_ISA despite having
isa-like devices.
Either way a new drive
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 03:13:46PM +, Russell King wrote:
> One thing which comes up in this instance is: what struct device should
> be used.
Current convention is to use a NULL device, it's from pre-generic
DMA times were only the pci_* types existed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 03:00:23PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Either way a new driver shouldn't use isa_virt_to_bus at all but rather
> use the proper DMA API and all those problems go away.
One thing which comes up in this instance is: what struct device should
be used.
With ISA devices d
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:54:17PM +, Russell King wrote:
> Christoph, did you mean to add anything?
Yes, this somehow got lost:
-
> > Russell, please undo this patch. isa_virt_to_bus() is not dependent on
> > CONFIG_ISA. It causes problems on x86_64 platforms which cannot enable
> > I
Christoph, did you mean to add anything?
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 01:57:14PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > >Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >
> > >>MMC_WBSD depends on ISA (needs isa_virt_to_bus())
> > >>
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> >>MMC_WBSD depends on ISA (needs isa_virt_to_bus())
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Thanks. Shouldn't have missed something so obvious :)
> >
> >Russell, can you fix this in your next merge?
>
Pierre Ossman wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
MMC_WBSD depends on ISA (needs isa_virt_to_bus())
Thanks. Shouldn't have missed something so obvious :)
Russell, can you fix this in your next merge?
Russell, please undo this patch. isa_virt_to_bus() is not dependent on
CONFIG_ISA. It causes problem
12 matches
Mail list logo
