On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I'd agree as soon as someone can convince me that we actually want ACPI
> support in the kernel for ARM64 servers. As far as I'm concerned it's quite
> possible that the people who have worked on this for the past couple of
> years behind clo
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:44:56AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 06 December 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> > OTOH if it's well encapsulated, is going to be required for any kind of
> > ACPI use and gets to the point where people are OK with it by itself
> > then I'm not sure what we'd gain b
On Friday 06 December 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:25:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > However, as I mentioned before I am much more worried about the parts that
> > are not done (or not posted) yet and that will be required to actually
> > have working support for a
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:25:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> However, as I mentioned before I am much more worried about the parts that
> are not done (or not posted) yet and that will be required to actually
> have working support for a real server system. Until we know more about
> where thi
On Tuesday 03 December 2013, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> This is the first part of making ACPI core running on ARM.
>
> PCI is optional on ARM64 but ACPI is dependent on PCI now, so
> in the first patch we try to make ACPI can be running without
> PCI.
>
> _PDC is requred for ACPI processor_core.c, but i
5 matches
Mail list logo
