> # echo 4 > /sys/class/net/gphy/operstate
> # ip link show gphy
> 4: gphy@eth1: mtu 1500
> qdisc noqueue switchid state TESTING mode DEFAULT group default
> qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:10:18:de:38:1f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
This looks good.
I stopped using ifconfig years ago, so i pers
On 05/01/2018 10:47 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:21:54AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 04/30/2018 04:24 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Turning these tests on will typically result in the link partner
dropping the link with us, and the interface will be non-functional
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 10:21:54 -0700
> On 04/30/2018 04:24 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Turning these tests on will typically result in the link partner
>>> dropping the link with us, and the interface will be non-functional as
>>> far as the data path is concerned (similar t
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:21:54AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 04/30/2018 04:24 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> Turning these tests on will typically result in the link partner
> >> dropping the link with us, and the interface will be non-functional as
> >> far as the data path is concerned (si
On 04/30/2018 04:24 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Turning these tests on will typically result in the link partner
>> dropping the link with us, and the interface will be non-functional as
>> far as the data path is concerned (similar to an isolation mode). This
>> might warrant properly reporting that
> Turning these tests on will typically result in the link partner
> dropping the link with us, and the interface will be non-functional as
> far as the data path is concerned (similar to an isolation mode). This
> might warrant properly reporting that to user-space through e.g: a
> private IFF_* v
On 04/30/2018 09:40 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Turning these tests on will typically result in the link partner
>> dropping the link with us, and the interface will be non-functional as
>> far as the data path is concerned (similar to an isolation mode). This
>> might warrant properly reporting that
> Turning these tests on will typically result in the link partner
> dropping the link with us, and the interface will be non-functional as
> far as the data path is concerned (similar to an isolation mode). This
> might warrant properly reporting that to user-space through e.g: a
> private IFF_* v
On 04/29/2018 07:55 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:32:30 -0700
>
>> This patch series adds support for specifying PHY test modes through
>> ethtool and paves the ground for adding support for more complex
>> test modes that might require data to be ex
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:32:30 -0700
> This patch series adds support for specifying PHY test modes through
> ethtool and paves the ground for adding support for more complex
> test modes that might require data to be exchanged between user and
> kernel space.
>
> As an e
10 matches
Mail list logo