Hi Gerry,
On 25.07.2014 [09:50:01 +0800], Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2014/7/25 7:32, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 23.07.2014 [16:20:24 +0800], Jiang Liu wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2014/7/22 1:57, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> >>> On 21.07.2014 [10:41:59 -0700], Tony Luck wrote:
> On Mon, J
On 2014/7/25 7:32, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 23.07.2014 [16:20:24 +0800], Jiang Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2014/7/22 1:57, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>>> On 21.07.2014 [10:41:59 -0700], Tony Luck wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan
wrote:
> It seems like
On 23.07.2014 [16:20:24 +0800], Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2014/7/22 1:57, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 21.07.2014 [10:41:59 -0700], Tony Luck wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan
> >> wrote:
> >>> It seems like the issue is the order of onlining of resources on
On 2014/7/22 1:57, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 21.07.2014 [10:41:59 -0700], Tony Luck wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan
>> wrote:
>>> It seems like the issue is the order of onlining of resources on a
>>> specific x86 platform?
>>
>> Yes. When we online a node t
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:41:59AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan
> wrote:
> > It seems like the issue is the order of onlining of resources on a
> > specific x86 platform?
>
> Yes. When we online a node the BIOS hits us with some ACPI hotplug even
On 21.07.2014 [10:41:59 -0700], Tony Luck wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan
> wrote:
> > It seems like the issue is the order of onlining of resources on a
> > specific x86 platform?
>
> Yes. When we online a node the BIOS hits us with some ACPI hotplug events:
>
> F
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan
wrote:
> It seems like the issue is the order of onlining of resources on a
> specific x86 platform?
Yes. When we online a node the BIOS hits us with some ACPI hotplug events:
First: Here are some new cpus
Next: Here is some new memory
Last;
Hi Jiang,
On 11.07.2014 [15:37:17 +0800], Jiang Liu wrote:
> Previously we have posted a patch fix a memory crash issue caused by
> memoryless node on x86 platforms, please refer to
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1687425
>
> As suggested by David Rientjes, the most suitable fix fo
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> I am pretty sure I've seen ppc64 machine with memoryless NUMA node.
>
Yes, Nishanth Aravamudan (now cc'd) has been working diligently on the
problems that have been encountered, including problems in generic kernel
code, on powerpc with memoryless node
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > There are other cases too.
>
> Are there any sane ones?
>
They are specifically allowed by the ACPI specification to be able to
include only cpus, I/O, networking cards, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne
On 07/11/2014 01:20 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Greg KH writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Any comments are welcomed!
>>>
>>> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculou
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > > Any comments are welcomed!
> >
> > Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous.
>
> I'm with Peter here, why would this be a situation that we should even
> support? A
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:51:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:20:51PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Greg KH writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > >> > An
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:20:51PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Greg KH writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> > Any comments are welcomed!
> >>
> >> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryle
Greg KH writes:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> > Any comments are welcomed!
>>
>> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous.
>
> I'm with Peter here, why would this be a s
On 07/11/2014 08:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> > > Any comments are welcomed!
>> >
>> > Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous.
> I'm with Peter
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > Any comments are welcomed!
>
> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous.
I'm with Peter here, why would this be a situation that we should eve
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Any comments are welcomed!
Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordom
18 matches
Mail list logo
