Re: [RFC PATCHv3 00/11] Intermix Lowmem and vmalloc

2014-01-07 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello, On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:08:26AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 1/3/2014 11:31 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >Hello, > > > >On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:08:52PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > >>On 1/3/2014 10:23 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: > >>>On 01/02/2014 01:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > The goa

Re: [RFC PATCHv3 00/11] Intermix Lowmem and vmalloc

2014-01-06 Thread Laura Abbott
On 1/3/2014 11:31 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hello, On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:08:52PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: On 1/3/2014 10:23 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: On 01/02/2014 01:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: The goal here is to allow as much lowmem to be mapped as if the block of memory was not reserved f

Re: [RFC PATCHv3 00/11] Intermix Lowmem and vmalloc

2014-01-03 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello, On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:08:52PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 1/3/2014 10:23 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: > >On 01/02/2014 01:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > >>The goal here is to allow as much lowmem to be mapped as if the block of > >>memory > >>was not reserved from the physical lowmem regi

Re: [RFC PATCHv3 00/11] Intermix Lowmem and vmalloc

2014-01-03 Thread Laura Abbott
On 1/3/2014 10:23 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: On 01/02/2014 01:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: The goal here is to allow as much lowmem to be mapped as if the block of memory was not reserved from the physical lowmem region. Previously, we had been hacking up the direct virt <-> phys translation to ignore

Re: [RFC PATCHv3 00/11] Intermix Lowmem and vmalloc

2014-01-03 Thread Dave Hansen
On 01/02/2014 01:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > The goal here is to allow as much lowmem to be mapped as if the block of > memory > was not reserved from the physical lowmem region. Previously, we had been > hacking up the direct virt <-> phys translation to ignore a large region of > memory. This d