Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/9] tracing: Add array printing helpers

2014-12-10 Thread Javi Merino
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:04:52PM +, Dave P Martin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:42:10PM +, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:04:12 + > > "Javi Merino" wrote: > > [...] > > > > + > > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u8, unsigned int, "0x%x"); > > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u16,

Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/9] tracing: Add array printing helpers

2014-12-08 Thread Dave P Martin
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:42:10PM +, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:04:12 + > "Javi Merino" wrote: [...] > > + > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u8, unsigned int, "0x%x"); > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u16, unsigned int, "0x%x"); > > +DEFINE_PRINT_ARRAY(u32, unsigned int, "0x%x"); > > +

Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/9] tracing: Add array printing helpers

2014-12-08 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:04:12 + "Javi Merino" wrote: > +static const char * > +ftrace_print_array_seq(struct trace_seq *p, const void *buf, int buf_len, > +bool (*iterator)(struct trace_seq *p, const char *prefix, > + const void **buf,

Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/9] tracing: Add array printing helpers

2014-12-08 Thread Dave P Martin
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 07:04:12PM +, Javi Merino wrote: > From: Dave Martin > > If a trace event contains an array, there is currently no standard > way to format this for text output. Drivers are currently hacking > around this by a) local hacks that use the trace_seq functionailty > direc