Hi Uwe,
On 30. 01. 19 16:39, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote:
[...]> There are quite some drivers known (to me) being buggy here. My feeling
is that Thierry doesn't share that impression and I think the only
reasonable path forward is to fir
Hello Michal,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> On 24.1.2019 11:44, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:12:12AM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> > > On 24.1.2019 10:22, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > I think it might be beneficial to allow (or require)
On 24.1.2019 11:44, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:12:12AM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote:
On 24.1.2019 10:22, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
I think it might be beneficial to allow (or require) that disable acts
immediately. But this is not how it used to be and in my discussion with
T
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:12:12AM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> On 24.1.2019 10:22, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > I think it might be beneficial to allow (or require) that disable acts
> > immediately. But this is not how it used to be and in my discussion with
> > Thierry (IIRC) he required to compl
On 24.1.2019 10:22, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 09:59:47AM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote:
On 12.12.2018 13:12, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:42:17AM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
On 12.12.2018 09:01, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 09:59:47AM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> On 12.12.2018 13:12, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:42:17AM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> > > On 12.12.2018 09:01, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> >
On 12.12.2018 13:12, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:42:17AM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
On 12.12.2018 09:01, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
Normally the PWM output is held LOW when PWM is disabled. This can cause
problem
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:42:17AM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> On 12.12.2018 09:01, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> >> Normally the PWM output is held LOW when PWM is disabled. This can cause
> >> problems when inverted PWM signal polarit
On 12.12.2018 09:01, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
>> Normally the PWM output is held LOW when PWM is disabled. This can cause
>> problems when inverted PWM signal polarity is needed. With this behavior
>> the connected circuit is fed by 100
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> Normally the PWM output is held LOW when PWM is disabled. This can cause
> problems when inverted PWM signal polarity is needed. With this behavior
> the connected circuit is fed by 100% duty cycle instead of being shut-off.
>
On 10.12.2018 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:15:05AM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
>> On 6.12.2018 17:16, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 03:37:55PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
On 6.12.2018 14:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 a
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:15:05AM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> On 6.12.2018 17:16, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 03:37:55PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> >> On 6.12.2018 14:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> >>>
>
On 6.12.2018 17:16, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 03:37:55PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
>> On 6.12.2018 14:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
>>>
>>> Can it happen, that pinctrl_pins_pwm is PTR_ERR(-EPROBE_DEFER)?
>>
>>
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 03:37:55PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> On 6.12.2018 14:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> >> +{
> >> + imx_chip->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(&pdev->dev);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(imx_chip->pinctrl)) {
> >> + de
On 6.12.2018 14:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
>>
>> +static int imx_pwm_init_pinctrl_info(struct imx_chip *imx_chip,
>> +struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> Please indent the follow up line to the opening parenthesis.
Meh,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> Normally the PWM output is held LOW when PWM is disabled. This can cause
> problems when inverted PWM signal polarity is needed. With this behavior
> the connected circuit is fed by 100% duty cycle instead of being shut-off.
>
> Allow
16 matches
Mail list logo
