Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-01-23 Thread Matt Porter
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:40:06PM +, Sekhar Nori wrote: > Matt, > > Sorry about the late reply. I noticed this mail only after I started to > look at v5 of your series :( Any time is fine! :) > On 1/11/2013 5:21 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:47:09PM +0530, Sekhar No

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-01-22 Thread Sekhar Nori
Matt, Sorry about the late reply. I noticed this mail only after I started to look at v5 of your series :( On 1/11/2013 5:21 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:47:09PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 10/18/2012 6:56 PM, Matt Porter wrote: >>> Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edm

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-01-10 Thread Matt Porter
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:47:09PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On 10/18/2012 6:56 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > > Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > > by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. This just moves the > > private EDMA API but does not support OMAP. > > > > Signed-off-

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2012-11-16 Thread Matt Porter
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:47:09PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On 10/18/2012 6:56 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > > Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > > by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. This just moves the > > private EDMA API but does not support OMAP. > > > > Signed-off-

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2012-10-28 Thread Sekhar Nori
On 10/18/2012 6:56 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. This just moves the > private EDMA API but does not support OMAP. > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter > --- > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c b/